Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33995819›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2021

Impact of specific immunotherapy and sting challenge on the quality of life in patients with hymenoptera venom allergy.

Tamara Eitel, Kim Nikola Zeiner, Katharina Assmus, Hanns Ackermann, Nadja Zoeller, Markus Meissner, Roland Kaufmann, Stefan Kippenberger, Eva Maria Valesky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy in Dogs: Safety and Clinical Efficacy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tamara EitelDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Kim Nikola ZeinerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Katharina AssmusDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Hanns AckermannDepartment of Biostatistics and Mathematical Models, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Nadja ZoellerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Markus MeissnerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Roland KaufmannDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Stefan KippenbergerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Eva Maria ValeskyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn experienced life-threating anaphylactic reaction to hymenoptera venom can sustainably impair patients' quality of life (QoL). Besides carrying emergency medication, venom-specific immunotherapy (VIT) exists as a causal treatment of allergy.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine QoL, anxiety, depression, and physical and mental health in patients allergic to hymenoptera venom before and during VIT and the impact of a tolerated sting challenge (SC).

methodsBetween July 2017 and August 2017, 142 patients with venom allergy were analyzed using validated questionnaires as the: Vespid Allergy Quality for Life Questionnaire" (VQLQ-d), the "Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale" (HADS-D) and the "Short Form 36" (SF-36). To evaluate the impact of VIT and SC on the QoL, patients were divided into 3 groups: (A) VIT and tolerated SC (n = 45), (B) VIT before carrying out SC (n = 73), and (C) therapy-naïve before VIT (n = 20). Further parameters like gender, age, insect species, and severity of the anaphylactic reaction were assessed.

resultsA significant correlation between the health-related QoL and the parameters of gender and state of treatment was seen. Especially male patients, as well as patients allergic to yellow jacket venom, benefit from a SC in terms of a significant increase in their QoL. In the total study cohort, a clear trend was observed towards a higher QoL in patients under VIT who tolerated a SC. Overall, neither the patients' age nor the insect species exerted a relevant influence on QoL, depression or anxiety. However, women showed a lower QoL combined with higher anxiety and depression scores than men.

conclusionImmunotherapy leads to an improved QoL, which can be further increased by a SC. A tolerated SC conceivably reassures the patients by objectifying the treatment success. Female patients appear to have a stronger impaired QoL per se. Taken together, a SC can be performed during VIT to strengthen the patients' QoL.

Indexed as

Hymenoptera venom allergyImmunotherapyQuality of lifeSting challenge

Identifiers

PMID33995819
PMCPMC8085710
OpenAlexW3152746879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.