Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33995757›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical devices2021

Clinical Translation of an Insertion Tool for Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Katherine E Riojas, Emily T Tran, Michael H Freeman, Jack H Noble, Robert J Webster, Robert F Labadie

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical devices, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine E RiojasDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212.
Emily T TranDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104.
Michael H FreemanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232.
Jack H NobleDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212.
Robert J WebsterDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212.
Robert F LabadieDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USUniversity of Tulsa · US

Funding

Research Supplements to Promote Diversity in Health-Related ResearchR01DC008408 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LABADIE, ROBERT F · 2007 to 2022
$7.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to describe the development of a minimally invasive cochlear implant surgery (MICIS) electrode array insertion tool concept to enable clinical translation. First, analysis of the geometric parameters of potential MICIS patients (N = 97) was performed to inform tool design, inform MICIS phantom model design, and provide further insight into MICIS candidacy. Design changes were made to the insertion tool based on clinical requirements and parameter analysis results. A MICIS phantom testing model was built to evaluate insertion force profiles in a clinically realistic manner, and the new tool design was evaluated in the model and in cadavers to test clinical viability. Finally, after regulatory approval, the tool was used for the first time in a clinical case. Results of this work included first, in the parameter analysis, approximately 20% of the population was not considered viable MICIS candidates. Additionally, one 3D printed tool could accommodate all viable candidates with polyimide sheath length adjustments accounting for interpatient variation. The insertion tool design was miniaturized out of clinical necessity and a disassembly method, necessary for removal around the cochlear implant, was developed and tested. Phantom model testing revealed that the force profile of the insertion tool was similar to that of traditional forceps insertion. Cadaver testing demonstrated that all clinical requirements (including complete disassembly) were achieved with the tool, and the new tool enabled 15% deeper insertions compared to the forceps approach. Finally, and most importantly, the tool helped achieve a full insertion in its first MICIS clinical case. In conclusion, the new insertion tool provides a clinically viable solution to one of the most difficult aspects of MICIS.

Identifiers

PMID33995757
PMCPMC8086187
OpenAlexW3133002435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.