Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33995598›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2021

Receptor conversion impacts outcomes of different molecular subtypes of primary breast cancer.

Weipeng Zhao, Linlin Sun, Guolei Dong, Xiaorui Wang, Yan Jia, Zhongsheng Tong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Real-world application ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A standardized pathology report for gastric cancer: 2nd edition.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Weipeng ZhaoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Ti Yuan Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
Linlin SunDepartment of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Ti Yuan Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
Guolei DongDepartment of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Ti Yuan Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
Xiaorui WangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Ti Yuan Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
Yan JiaDepartment of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Ti Yuan Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
Zhongsheng TongDepartment of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, West Huan-Hu Road, Ti Yuan Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8060-5699
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the conversion of clinically used breast cancer biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) between primary tumors and metastatic lesions is well recognized, data on whether receptor conversion has an effect on therapy management and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer is limited. This study aimed to investigate the clinical implications of receptor conversion throughout tumor progression.

methodsIn total, 2450 patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were analyzed and 426 female patients with available biopsy results from both primary and metastatic sites were included in this study. We investigated the alteration of ER, PR and HER2 during breast cancer progression and evaluated the therapy management and prognostic value of receptor conversion.

resultsThe conversion rates of ER, PR, and HER2 between primary tumors and metastasis were 21.1% (McNemar's test

conclusionsOur findings indicated that receptor conversion during breast tumor progression had a significant effect on survival. Most importantly, our findings proved that patients with receptor conversion benefited from a change in therapy.

Indexed as

breast cancermetastasisoutcomesprimary tumorreceptor conversiontherapy

Identifiers

PMID33995598
PMCPMC8111518
OpenAlexW3158410849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.