ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2021
Oral drugs in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Traditional Chinese medicines and capecitabine-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer treatment: A meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Multifunctional armored nanoemulsion of elemene combining ferroptosis induction and gut homeostasis restoration in colorectal cancer therapy.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Article
- Targeting drug resistant colorectal cancer with apigenin nanoarchitectures.Translational oncology · 2025Review
- Revelation of prognosis and tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer based on genes related to antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis and single-cell landscape.Clinical proteomics · 2025Article
- Colorectal Cancer: Therapeutic Approaches and Their Complications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Article
- Advancements in the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Implications of Intestinal Bacteria.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Targeting signaling pathways with andrographolide in cancer therapy (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Polymorphism c.2194G>A Screening Is a Useful Tool for Decreasing Gastrointestinal and Hematological Adverse Drug Reaction Risk in Fluoropyrimidine-Treated Patients.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- The conjugates of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine and hydroxycinnamic acids - synthesis, anti-pancreatic cancer activity and molecular docking studies.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Exploring the clinical significance of IL-38 correlation with PD-1, CTLA-4, and FOXP3 in colorectal cancer draining lymph nodes.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- The effective combination therapies with irinotecan for colorectal cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Using oral tegafur/uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching study from Taiwan.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Renal Disorders with Oral Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Analysis from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Microneedles for Efficient and Precise Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Gut Microbiome in Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Review
- Survival and Toxicities of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Regorafenib before TAS-102 or Vice Versa: A Mono-Institutional Real-Practice Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Pharmacogenomic-guided dosing of fluoropyrimidines beyondFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common forms of cancer, with an estimated 1.36 million new cases and almost 700,000 deaths annually. Approximately 21% of patients with CRC have metastatic disease at diagnosis. The objective of this article is to review the literature on the efficacy and safety of oral drugs available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several such drugs have been developed, and fluoropyrimidines are the backbone of chemotherapy in this indication. They exert their antitumour activity by disrupting the synthesis and function of DNA and RNA. Oral fluoropyrimidines include prodrugs capecitabine, tegafur, eniluracil/5-fluorouracil, tegafur/uracil, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI). Oral drugs offer several advantages over injectable formulations, including convenience, flexibility, avoidance of injection-related adverse events (AEs) and, in some circumstances, lower costs. However, oral drugs may not be suitable for patients with gastrointestinal obstruction or malabsorption, they may result in reduced treatment adherence and should not be co-administered with drugs that interfere with absorption or hepatic metabolism. Oral fluoropyrimidines such as capecitabine, as monotherapy or in combination with oxaliplatin, irinotecan or bevacizumab, are as effective as intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in first-line treatment of mCRC. Other oral fluoropyrimidines, such as FTD/TPI, are effective in patients with mCRC who are refractory, intolerant or ineligible for 5-FU. In addition, oral fluoropyrimidines are used in adjuvant treatment of mCRC. Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor used in patients in whom several previous lines of therapy have failed. Frequent AEs associated with oral drugs used in the treatment of CRC include hand-foot syndrome and gastrointestinal and haematological toxicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.