Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33995592›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2021

Oral drugs in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Pilar García-Alfonso, Andrés Jesús Muñoz Martín, Laura Ortega Morán, Javier Soto Alsar, Gabriela Torres Pérez-Solero, Montserrat Blanco Codesido, Pilar Aitana Calvo Ferrandiz, Silvina Grasso Cicala

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Translational cancer research · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pilar García-AlfonsoOncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo 46, Madrid, 28009, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-9978
Andrés Jesús Muñoz MartínOncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Laura Ortega MoránOncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Soto AlsarOncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Gabriela Torres Pérez-SoleroOncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Montserrat Blanco CodesidoOncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Pilar Aitana Calvo FerrandizOncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Silvina Grasso CicalaMedical Affairs Servier, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESServier (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common forms of cancer, with an estimated 1.36 million new cases and almost 700,000 deaths annually. Approximately 21% of patients with CRC have metastatic disease at diagnosis. The objective of this article is to review the literature on the efficacy and safety of oral drugs available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several such drugs have been developed, and fluoropyrimidines are the backbone of chemotherapy in this indication. They exert their antitumour activity by disrupting the synthesis and function of DNA and RNA. Oral fluoropyrimidines include prodrugs capecitabine, tegafur, eniluracil/5-fluorouracil, tegafur/uracil, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI). Oral drugs offer several advantages over injectable formulations, including convenience, flexibility, avoidance of injection-related adverse events (AEs) and, in some circumstances, lower costs. However, oral drugs may not be suitable for patients with gastrointestinal obstruction or malabsorption, they may result in reduced treatment adherence and should not be co-administered with drugs that interfere with absorption or hepatic metabolism. Oral fluoropyrimidines such as capecitabine, as monotherapy or in combination with oxaliplatin, irinotecan or bevacizumab, are as effective as intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in first-line treatment of mCRC. Other oral fluoropyrimidines, such as FTD/TPI, are effective in patients with mCRC who are refractory, intolerant or ineligible for 5-FU. In addition, oral fluoropyrimidines are used in adjuvant treatment of mCRC. Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor used in patients in whom several previous lines of therapy have failed. Frequent AEs associated with oral drugs used in the treatment of CRC include hand-foot syndrome and gastrointestinal and haematological toxicities.

Indexed as

adjuvantcapecitabinecolorectal cancerfirst-linemetastaticS-1TAS-102UFT

Identifiers

PMID33995592
PMCPMC8111515
OpenAlexW3158926365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.