Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33995569›Full record

ArticleObstetric medicine2021

Blood pressure assessments of pregnant women in a Day Assessment Unit - A prospective observational study.

Vidhu Krishnan, Angela Makris, AnneMarie Hennessy, Brian Hollis, Gaksoo Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetric medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vidhu KrishnanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7044-2654
Angela MakrisDepartment of Renal Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia.
AnneMarie HennessySchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Brian HollisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia.
Gaksoo LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe investigated the optimum time and number of observations for assessing women in the Day Assessment Unit.

methodsA single centre prospective observational study was undertaken. Women referred for blood pressure assessment in the Day Assessment Unit were recruited.

resultsThe blood pressure of women who subsequently developed preeclampsia was noted to change differently over the time of observation compared to women with other hypertensive disorders, most notably in the first and third hour (p = 0.042), although the averages at each hour did not differ between these two groups.

conclusionsMean blood pressure measured over four hours did not significantly differ compared to blood pressure measured over one hour. Women who subsequently developed preeclampsia had a different pattern of blood pressure change whilst in the Day Assessment Unit.

Indexed as

blood pressure assessmentgestational hypertensionPre-eclampsia

Identifiers

PMID33995569
PMCPMC8107962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.