Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33995422›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2021

Natural Killer Cells: The Linchpin for Successful Cancer Immunotherapy.

Kari A Shaver, Tayler J Croom-Perez, Alicja J Copik

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. From glioma gloom to immune bloom: unveiling novel immunotherapeutic paradigms-a review.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kari A ShaverCollege of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Tayler J Croom-PerezBurnett School of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Alicja J CopikBurnett School of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
University of Central Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy is a highly successful and rapidly evolving treatment modality that works by augmenting the body's own immune system. While various immune stimulation strategies such as PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade result in robust responses, even in patients with advanced cancers, the overall response rate is low. While immune checkpoint inhibitors are known to enhance cytotoxic T cells' antitumor response, current evidence suggests that immune responses independent of cytotoxic T cells, such as Natural Killer (NK) cells, play crucial role in the efficacy of immunotherapeutic interventions. NK cells hold a distinct role in potentiating the innate immune response and activating the adaptive immune system. This review highlights the importance of the early actions of the NK cell response and the pivotal role NK cells hold in priming the immune system and setting the stage for successful response to cancer immunotherapy. Yet, in many patients the NK cell compartment is compromised thus lowering the chances of successful outcomes of many immunotherapies. An overview of mechanisms that can drive NK cell dysfunction and hinder immunotherapy success is provided. Rather than relying on the likely dysfunctional endogenous NK cells to work with immunotherapies, adoptive allogeneic NK cell therapies provide a viable solution to increase response to immunotherapies. This review highlights the advances made in development of NK cell therapeutics for clinical application with evidence supporting their combinatorial application with other immune-oncology approaches to improve outcomes of immunotherapies.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCombined Modality TherapyGenetic TherapyHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint ProteinsImmunity, InnateImmunotherapyKiller Cells, NaturalMembrane ProteinsMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapySignal TransductionBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint ProteinsMembrane ProteinsSTING1 protein, humanSTING Proteinadoptive NK cell therapyimmuno-oncology combinationsimmunotherapy resistancenatural killer (NK) cellsNK cell crosstalkNK cell dysfunctionNK cells and checkpoint blockadeNK cells and immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33995422
PMCPMC8115550
OpenAlexW3157734193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.