Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33995121›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021

Proteomics and Machine Learning Approaches Reveal a Set of Prognostic Markers for COVID-19 Severity With Drug Repurposing Potential.

Kruthi Suvarna, Deeptarup Biswas, Medha Gayathri J Pai, Arup Acharjee, Renuka Bankar, Viswanthram Palanivel, Akanksha Salkar, Ayushi Verma, Amrita Mukherjee, Manisha Choudhury and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Plasma Proteins Associated with COVID-19 Severity in Puerto Rico.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kruthi SuvarnaDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Deeptarup BiswasDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Medha Gayathri J PaiDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Arup AcharjeeDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Renuka BankarDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Viswanthram PalanivelDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Akanksha SalkarDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Ayushi VermaDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Amrita MukherjeeDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Manisha ChoudhuryDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Saicharan GhantasalaCentre for Research in Nanotechnology and Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Susmita GhoshDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Avinash SinghDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Arghya BanerjeeDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Apoorva BadayaDepartment of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Surbhi BihaniDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Gaurish LoyaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Krishi MantriDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Ananya BurliDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Jyotirmoy RoyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Alisha SrivastavaDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Sachee AgrawalKasturba Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Mumbai, India.
Om ShrivastavKasturba Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Mumbai, India.
Jayanthi ShastriKasturba Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Mumbai, India.
Sanjeeva SrivastavaDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay · INKasturba Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pestilential pathogen SARS-CoV-2 has led to a seemingly ceaseless pandemic of COVID-19. The healthcare sector is under a tremendous burden, thus necessitating the prognosis of COVID-19 severity. This in-depth study of plasma proteome alteration provides insights into the host physiological response towards the infection and also reveals the potential prognostic markers of the disease. Using label-free quantitative proteomics, we performed deep plasma proteome analysis in a cohort of 71 patients (20 COVID-19 negative, 18 COVID-19 non-severe, and 33 severe) to understand the disease dynamics. Of the 1200 proteins detected in the patient plasma, 38 proteins were identified to be differentially expressed between non-severe and severe groups. The altered plasma proteome revealed significant dysregulation in the pathways related to peptidase activity, regulated exocytosis, blood coagulation, complement activation, leukocyte activation involved in immune response, and response to glucocorticoid biological processes in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, we employed supervised machine learning (ML) approaches using a linear support vector machine model to identify the classifiers of patients with non-severe and severe COVID-19. The model used a selected panel of 20 proteins and classified the samples based on the severity with a classification accuracy of 0.84. Putative biomarkers such as angiotensinogen and SERPING1 and ML-derived classifiers including the apolipoprotein B, SERPINA3, and fibrinogen gamma chain were validated by targeted mass spectrometry-based multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) assays. We also employed an

Indexed as

COVID-19 plasmadrug-repurposinghost responsemachine learningmass spectrometrymolecular pathwaysprognostic biomarkersproteomics

Identifiers

PMID33995121
PMCPMC8120435
OpenAlexW3157779513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.