Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33994930›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Neuroimmune Interactions and Rhythmic Regulation of Innate Lymphoid Cells.

Nicolas Jacquelot, Gabrielle T Belz, Cyril Seillet

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Factors Determining Plasticity of Responses to Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Overview: Themes in Innate Lymphoid Cell Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas JacquelotWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Gabrielle T BelzWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Cyril SeilletWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Earth's rotation around its axis, is one of the parameters that never changed since life emerged. Therefore, most of the organisms from the cyanobacteria to humans have conserved natural oscillations to regulate their physiology. These daily oscillations define the circadian rhythms that set the biological clock for almost all physiological processes of an organism. They allow the organisms to anticipate and respond behaviorally and physiologically to changes imposed by the day/night cycle. As other physiological systems, the immune system is also regulated by circadian rhythms and while diurnal variation in host immune responses to lethal infection have been observed for many decades, the underlying mechanisms that affect immune function and health have only just started to emerge. These oscillations are generated by the central clock in our brain, but neuroendocrine signals allow the synchronization of the clocks in peripheral tissues. In this review, we discuss how the neuroimmune interactions create a rhythmic activity of the innate lymphoid cells. We highlight how the disruption of these rhythmic regulations of immune cells can disturb homeostasis and lead to the development of chronic inflammation in murine models.

Indexed as

circadian rhythmhomeostasisinflammationneuroimmune interactionsneuropeptide

Identifiers

PMID33994930
PMCPMC8116950
OpenAlexW3159134066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.