Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33994759›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2023

Resilience mechanisms at work: The psychological immunity-psychological elasticity (PI-PE) model of psychological resilience.

Richta C IJntema, Wilmar B Schaufeli, Yvonne D Burger

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richta C IJntemaDepartment of Social, Health and Organizational Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, P. O. box 80.140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3395-6116
Wilmar B SchaufeliDepartment of Social, Health and Organizational Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, P. O. box 80.140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Yvonne D BurgerSchool of Business and Economics, Center for Executive Coaching, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, scientists have shifted their focus from studying psychological resilience as a single, isolated construct (e.g. attribute or outcome) to studying it as a dynamic process encompassing a number of temporally related elements. Models depicting this process explain why some people adapt to stressor exposure, whereas others do not. To date, these process models did not sufficiently explain how people adapt

Indexed as

AdaptationNarrative constructionPsychological immunity-psychological elasticity (PI-PE) modelPsychological resilienceStressorTolerance

Identifiers

PMID33994759
PMCPMC8106546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.