ArticleNeural computing & applications2022
Thesaurus-based word embeddings for automated biomedical literature classification.
Article in Neural computing & applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of word embedding models on text analytics in deep learning environment: a review.Artificial intelligence review · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The special nature, volume and broadness of biomedical literature pose barriers for automated classification methods. On the other hand, manually indexing is time-consuming, costly and error prone. We argue that current word embedding algorithms can be efficiently used to support the task of biomedical text classification even in a multilabel setting, with many distinct labels. The ontology representation of Medical Subject Headings provides machine-readable labels and specifies the dimensionality of the problem space. Both deep- and shallow network approaches are implemented. Predictions are determined by the similarity between extracted features from contextualized representations of abstracts and headings. The addition of a separate classifier for transfer learning is also proposed and evaluated. Large datasets of biomedical citations are harvested for their metadata and used for training and testing. These automated approaches are still far from entirely substituting human experts, yet they can be useful as a mechanism for validation and recommendation. Dataset balancing, distributed processing and training parallelization in GPUs, all play an important part regarding the effectiveness and performance of proposed methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.