Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33994609›Full record

ArticlePersonality and individual differences2021

Self-Report Measures of Anhedonia and Approach Motivation Weakly Correspond to Anhedonia and Depression Assessed via Clinical Interviews.

Paul J Silvia, Kari M Eddington, Kathleen H Maloney, Jaimie M Lunsford, Kelly L Harper, Thomas R Kwapil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Personality and individual differences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul J SilviaDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Kari M EddingtonDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Kathleen H MaloneyDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Jaimie M LunsfordDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Kelly L HarperNational Center for PTSD, Behavioral Science Division, VA Boston Healthcare System.
Thomas R KwapilDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Funding

Self-focused attention, self-evaluation, and effortR15MH079374 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO · PI SILVIA, PAUL JOSEPH · 2010 to 2014
$641k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH079374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-report scales are popular tools for measuring anhedonic experiences and motivational deficits, but how well do they reflect clinically significant anhedonia? Seventy-eight adults participated in face-to-face structured diagnostic interviews: 22 showed clinically significant anhedonia, and 18 met criteria for depression. Analyses of effect sizes comparing the anhedonia and depression groups to their respective controls found large effects, as expected, for measures of depressive symptoms, but surprisingly weak effect sizes (all less than

Indexed as

anhedoniadepressionindividual differencesmotivationreward seeking

Identifiers

PMID33994609
PMCPMC8115217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.