Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33994572›Full record

ArticleRevista clinica espanola2020

[Monitoring of COVID-19 patients by telemedicine with telemonitoring].

M Martínez-García, M Bal-Alvarado, F Santos Guerra, R Ares-Rico, R Suárez-Gil, A Rodríguez-Álvarez, A Pérez-López, E Casariego-Vales, en nombre del Equipo de Seguimiento Compartido TELEA-COVID Lugo, Equipo TELEA COVID-19 (Lugo)

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista clinica espanola, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development of the Web-Based Spanish Version of the Barthel Index in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The value of telephone consultations during COVID-19 pandemic. An observational study.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2021
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M Martínez-GarcíaHospital de Día de Procesos, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, España.
M Bal-AlvaradoServicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, España.
F Santos GuerraServicio de Gestión de Proyectos de Sistemas de Información, Servicio Gallego de Salud, Consejería de Sanidad, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España.
R Ares-RicoGerencia, Área Sanitaria de Lugo, A Mariña y Monforte de Lemos, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, España.
R Suárez-GilServicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, España.
A Rodríguez-ÁlvarezServicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, España.
A Pérez-LópezServicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, España.
E Casariego-ValesServicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, España.
en nombre del Equipo de Seguimiento Compartido TELEA-COVID Lugo
Equipo TELEA COVID-19 (Lugo)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo asses if telemedicine with telemonitoring is a clinically useful and secure tool in the tracking of patients with COVID-19.

methodsA prospective observational study of patients with COVID-19 diagnosis by positive PCR considered high-risk tracked with telemedicine and telemonitoring was conducted in the sanitary area of Lugo between March 17th and April 17th, 2020. Two groups of patients were included: Outpatient Tracing from the beginning and after discharge. Every patient sent a daily clinical questionnaire with temperature and oxygen saturation 3 times a day. Proactive monitoring was done by getting in touch with every patient at least 11 a day.

results313 patients (52.4% female) with a total average age of 60.9 (DE 15.9) years were included. Additionally, 2 patients refused to join the program. Since the beginning, 224 were traced outpatient and 89 after being discharged. Among the first category, 38 (16.90%) were referred to Emergency department on 43 occasions; 18 were hospitalized (8.03%), and 2 deceased. Neither deaths nor a matter of vital emergency occurred at home. When including patients after admissions monitoring was done in 304 cases. One patient re-entered (0.32%) to the hospital, and another one left the program (0.32%). The average time of monitoring was 11.64 (SD 3.58) days, and 224 (73.68%) patients were discharged during the 30 days of study.

conclusionsOur study suggests that telemedicine with home telemonitoring, used proactively, allows for monitoring high-risk patients with COVID-19 in a clinically useful and secure way.

Indexed as

Case managementCOVID-19COVID-19 managementTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33994572
PMCPMC7274600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.