Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33994134›Full record

ArticleWomen and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives2022

The impact of COVID-19 on pregnant womens' experiences and perceptions of antenatal maternity care, social support, and stress-reduction strategies.

Sarah Meaney, Sara Leitao, Ellinor K Olander, Johanna Pope, Karen Matvienko-Sikar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Maternal deaths in the UK before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah MeaneyNational Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Ireland.
Sara LeitaoNational Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Ireland.
Ellinor K OlanderCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
Johanna PopeSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland.
Karen Matvienko-SikarSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: karen.msikar@ucc.ie.
University College Cork · IECity, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has impacted on maternity care, supports and women's mental health.

aimThe aim of this study was to assess pregnant women's satisfaction with antenatal care and social support and to examine stress-reduction strategies women used during the pandemic.

methodsAn online survey was conducted between June and July 2020. Pregnant women, aged over 18 years were recruited. The survey included closed and open-ended questions to assess women's perceptions and satisfaction with their antenatal care, social support, and stress-reduction strategies. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis were used for quantitative analyses; qualitative content analysis was used for open-ended questions.

findings573 pregnant women completed the survey. Women reported low levels of social support which was predicted by women's mental health and demographic factors and was related to public health and maternity service restrictions. Women reported that restrictions implemented in the maternity services limited their face-to face interactions with healthcare professionals and meant their partners could not attend antenatal appointments or support them in the postpartum period in the maternity setting. The lack of information on COVID-19 and pregnancy meant women had greater uncertainty about pregnancy and birth. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate how the lack of access to antenatal care and reduced perceived social support as a result of the restrictions implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially intensifies pregnancy specific stress.

conclusionsThere is a need for the provision of supportive care, both formally and informally, particularly with women who may be more vulnerable during a pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Maternal Health ServicesAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPandemicsParturitionPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareSARS-CoV-2Social SupportAntenatal careCOVID-19maternity caresocial supportstress-reduction

Identifiers

PMID33994134
PMCPMC9051126
OpenAlexW3159709905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.