Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33994095›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2021

Engineering skeletal muscle: Building complexity to achieve functionality.

Eszter Mihaly, Dallas E Altamirano, Sami Tuffaha, Warren Grayson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Novel muscle-derived extracellular matrix hydrogel promotes angiogenesis and neurogenesis in volumetric muscle loss.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eszter MihalyTranslational Tissue Engineering Center, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Dallas E AltamiranoTranslational Tissue Engineering Center, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Sami TuffahaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Warren GraysonTranslational Tissue Engineering Center, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Institute for NanoBioTechnology (INBT), Johns Hopkins University School of Engineering, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. Electronic address: wgrayson@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007057 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KANOLD, PATRICK O, KARCHIN, RACHEL · 1985 to 2023
$10.4M
Regenerating Vascularized and Innervated Skeletal Muscle to Treat VML DefectsR01AR077581 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRAYSON, WARREN L, LEE, GABSANG · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077581NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) VML is defined as the loss of a critical mass of skeletal muscle that overwhelms the muscle's natural healing mechanisms, leaving patients with permanent functional deficits and deformity. The treatment of these defects is complex, as skeletal muscle is a composite structure that relies closely on the action of supporting tissues such as tendons, vasculature, nerves, and bone. The gold standard of treatment for VML injuries, an autologous muscle flap transfer, suffers from many shortcomings but nevertheless remains the best clinically available avenue to restore function. This review will consider the use of composite tissue engineered constructs, with multiple components that act together to replicate the function of an intact muscle, as an alternative to autologous muscle flaps. We will discuss recent advances in the field of tissue engineering that enable skeletal muscle constructs to more closely reproduce the functionality of an autologous muscle flap by incorporating vasculature, promoting innervation, and reconstructing the muscle-tendon boundary. Additionally, our understanding of the cellular composition of skeletal muscle has evolved to recognize the importance of a diverse variety of cell types in muscle regeneration, including fibro/adipogenic progenitors and immune cells like macrophages and regulatory T cells. We will address recent advances in our understanding of how these cell types interact with, and can be incorporated into, implanted tissue engineered constructs.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMiceMuscle, SkeletalMuscular DiseasesTissue EngineeringAutologous Muscle Flap TransferInnervationMyotendinous junctionTissue Engineered Skeletal MuscleVascularizationVolumetric Muscle Loss

Identifiers

PMID33994095
PMCPMC8918036
OpenAlexW3163613598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.