Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33993354›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2022

The supplementary motor area syndrome: a neurosurgical review.

Harry Pinson, Jeroen Van Lerbeirghe, Dimitri Vanhauwaert, Olivier Van Damme, Giorgio Hallaert, Jean-Pierre Kalala

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontal lobe disconnection: How I do it.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harry PinsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium. harry.pinson@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0650-4213
Jeroen Van LerbeirgheDepartment of Neurosurgery, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Dimitri VanhauwaertDepartment of Neurosurgery, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Olivier Van DammeDepartment of Neurosurgery, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Giorgio HallaertDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Jean-Pierre KalalaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
AZ Delta · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome is a frequently encountered clinical phenomenon associated with surgery of the dorsomedial prefrontal lobe. The region has a known motor sequencing function and the dominant pre-SMA specifically is associated with more complex language functions; the SMA is furthermore incorporated in the negative motor network. The SMA has a rich interconnectivity with other cortical regions and subcortical structures using the frontal aslant tract (FAT) and the frontostriatal tract (FST). The development of the SMA syndrome is positively correlated with the extent of resection of the SMA region, especially its medial side. This may be due to interruption of the nearby callosal association fibres as the contralateral SMA has a particular important function in brain plasticity after SMA surgery. The syndrome is characterized by a profound decrease in interhemispheric connectivity of the motor network hubs. Clinical improvement is related to increasing connectivity between the contralateral SMA region and the ipsilateral motor hubs. Overall, most patients know a full recovery of the SMA syndrome, however a minority of patients might continue to suffer from mild motor and speech dysfunction. Rarely, no recovery of neurological function after SMA region resection is reported.

Indexed as

Motor CortexBrain MappingHumansLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingSyndromeGlioma surgeryLiterature reviewSMA syndrome

Identifiers

PMID33993354
OpenAlexW3161922896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.