Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33993333›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2021

The prognostic value of MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis.

Silin Chen, Ning Li, Yuan Tang, Jinming Shi, Ying Zhao, Huiying Ma, Shulian Wang, Ye-Xiong Li, Jing Jin

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CSCO guidelines for colorectal cancer version 2023: Updates and insights.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silin ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Ning LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yuan TangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jinming ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Ying ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Huiying MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Shulian WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Ye-Xiong LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jing JinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center / National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. jinjing@csco.org.cn.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Capital Funds for Health Improvement and Research 2020-1-4021Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University 3332019055National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognostic value of MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) and mrEMVI after neoadjuvant therapy (ymrEMVI) in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

methodsA systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was carried out up to June 2020. Studies that evaluated mrEMVI, used treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, and reported survival were included. The time-to-event outcomes (OS and DFS rates) are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). If the HR was not reported in the study, it was calculated from the survival curve using methods according to Parmar's recommendation. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis.

resultsA total of 2237 patients from 11 studies were included, and the pooled analysis of the overall results from eight studies showed that patients who were mrEMVI positive at baseline had significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS) (random-effects model: HR = 2.50 [1.84, 3.14]; Z = 5.83, p < 0.00001). The pooled analysis of the overall results from six studies showed that patients who were ymrEMVI positive following neoadjuvant therapy had significantly worse DFS (random-effects model: HR = 2.24 [1.73, 2.90], Z = 6.12, p < 0.00001). Patients with mrEMVI positivity at baseline were also associated with worse overall survival (OS) (random-effects model: HR = 1.93 [1.36, 2.73]; Z = 3.71, p < 0.00001).

conclusionmrEMVI and ymrEMVI positivity are poor prognostic factors for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. The precise evaluation of EMVI may contribute to designing individualised treatments and improving patient outcomes. KEY POINTS: • Extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) is a prognostic factor for rectal cancer. • MRI can be used to evaluate EMVI status before (mrEMVI) and after neoadjuvant therapy (ymrEMVI). • The evaluation of mrEMVI and ymrEMVI in neoadjuvant therapy would provide an early assessment of patient prognosis.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyPrognosisRectal neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33993333
OpenAlexW3160327658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.