ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2021
Mechanistic similarities in recognition of histone tails and DNA by epigenetic readers.
Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic Impact of Curcumin and Thymoquinone on Cancer Therapeutics.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- MLL4 binds TET3.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2024Article
- C2H2 Zinc Finger Transcription Factors Associated with Hemoglobinopathies.Journal of molecular biology · 2024Review
- Histone H4K16ac Binding Function of the Triple PHD Finger Cassette of MLL4.Journal of molecular biology · 2024Article
- Exploring new roles for RNA-binding proteins in epigenetic and gene regulation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024Review
- Molecular basis for nuclear accumulation and targeting of the inhibitor of apoptosis BIRC2.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2023Article
- Non-histone binding functions of PHD fingers.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2023Review
- Conformational and Thermodynamic Differences Underlying Wild-Type and Mutant Eleven-Nineteen-Leukemia YEATS Domain Specificity for Epigenetic Marks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Alternative Mechanisms for DNA Engagement by BET Bromodomain-Containing Proteins.Biochemistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The past two decades have witnessed rapid advances in the identification and characterization of epigenetic readers, capable of recognizing or reading post-translational modifications in histones. More recently, a new set of readers with the ability to interact with the nucleosome through concomitant binding to histones and DNA has emerged. In this review, we discuss mechanistic insights underlying bivalent histone and DNA recognition by newly characterized readers and highlight the importance of binding to DNA for their association with chromatin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.