Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33992718›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2021

Five-Year Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Cosmesis in a Randomized Trial of Conventionally Fractionated Versus Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation.

Julius K Weng, Xiudong Lei, Pamela Schlembach, Elizabeth S Bloom, Simona F Shaitelman, Isidora Y Arzu, Gregory Chronowski, Tomas Dvorak, Emily Grade, Karen Hoffman and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Julius K WengUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Xiudong LeiUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Pamela SchlembachUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Elizabeth S BloomUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Simona F ShaitelmanUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Isidora Y ArzuUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Gregory ChronowskiUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Tomas DvorakOrlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, Florida.
Emily GradeBanner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona.
Karen HoffmanUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
George PerkinsUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Valerie K ReedUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Shalin J ShahUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Michael C StauderUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Eric A StromUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Welela TereffeUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Wendy A WoodwardUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Gabriel N HortobagyiUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Kelly K HuntUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Thomas A BuchholzScripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Diego, California.
Benjamin D SmithUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: bsmith3@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBanner MD Anderson Cancer CenterOrlando Health · USScripps MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Lymphatic and systemic immunity changes in post-radiation lymphedema developmentR01CA201487 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ALDRICH, MELISSA B · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Estimating the Cost Trajectories and Projecting the Cost of Cancer Care in the United States: Methodology and ApplicationR01CA225646 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LI, LIANG, SHIH, YA-CHEN TINA · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Technology Diffusion in Cancer: Geographic Variations, Facilitators, Outcomes, and CostsR01CA207216 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHIH, YA-CHEN TINA · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
Augmenting Anti-Tumor Immunity Using Radiation in the Setting of DNA Repair DefectsR21CA252411 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SAWAKUCHI, GABRIEL OLIVEIRA, SHAITELMAN, SIMONA · 2020 to 2020
$431k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201487NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207216NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225646NCI NIH HHS R21 CA252411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are limited prospective data on predictors of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after whole-breast irradiation (WBI) plus a boost. We sought to characterize longitudinal PROs and cosmesis in a randomized trial comparing conventionally fractionated (CF) versus hypofractionated (HF) WBI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2011 to 2014, women aged ≥40 years with Tis-T2 N0-N1a M0 breast cancer who underwent a lumpectomy with negative margins were randomized to CF-WBI (50 Gray [Gy]/25 fractions plus boost) versus HF-WBI (42.56 Gy/16 fractions plus boost). At baseline (pre-radiation), at 6 months, and yearly thereafter through 5 years, PROs included the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), and Body Image Scale; cosmesis was reported by the treating physician using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group cosmesis values. Multivariable mixed-effects growth curve models evaluated associations of the treatment arm and patient factors with outcomes and tested for relevant interactions with the treatment arm.

resultsA total of 287 patients were randomized, completing a total of 14,801 PRO assessments. The median age was 60 years, 37% of patients had a bra cup size ≥D, 44% were obese, and 30% received chemotherapy. Through 5 years, there were no significant differences in PROs or cosmesis by treatment arm. A bra cup size ≥D was associated with worse BCTOS cosmesis (P < .001), BCTOS pain (P = .001), FACT-B Trial Outcome Index (P = .03), FACT-B Emotional Well-being (P = .03), and Body Image Scale (P = .003) scores. Physician-rated cosmesis was worse in patients who were overweight (P = .02) or obese (P < .001). No patient subsets experienced better PROs or cosmesis with CF-WBI.

conclusionsBoth CF-WBI and HF-WBI confer similar longitudinal PROs and physician-rated cosmesis through 5 years of follow-up, with no relevant subsets that fared better with CF-WBI. This evidence supports broad adoption of hypofractionation with boost, including in patients receiving chemotherapy and in a population with a high prevalence of obesity. The associations of large breast size and obesity with adverse outcomes across multiple domains highlight the opportunity to engage at-risk patients in lifestyle intervention strategies, as well as to consider alternative radiation treatment regimens.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresRadiation Dose HypofractionationAgedBody ImageBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID33992718
PMCPMC9057640
OpenAlexW2524269841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.