Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33992486›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2022

Conflicting goals and obligations: Tensions affecting communication in pediatric oncology.

Bryan A Sisk, Ginny Schulz, Erica C Kaye, Justin N Baker, Jennifer W Mack, James M DuBois

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In the end, it is the word that remains: communicating bad news in pediatric oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Understanding theChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan A SiskDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: siskb@wustl.edu.
Ginny SchulzDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Erica C KayeDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Justin N BakerDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA; Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Jennifer W MackPediatric Oncology and Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
James M DuBoisDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the tensions experienced by clinicians and psychosocial professionals that affect communication in pediatric oncology.

methodsTen focus groups with nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians, and psychosocial professionals at 2 US institutions. We analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis, assessing tensions experienced when communicating with parents.

resultsWe identified 5 themes of tensions, defined as challenges experienced when clinicians and psychosocial professionals are trying to achieve multiple conflicting goals or obligations while communicating: (1) Supporting parental hopes while providing honest opinions and information; (2) disclosing all possible outcomes while avoiding the creation of new worries or uncertainties; (3) building relationships while maintaining personal boundaries; (4) disclosing sensitive information while adhering to professional role and perceived authority; (5) validating parental beliefs or decisions while fulfilling obligation for honesty. Some tensions represented conflicts between different communication goals. Others represented conflicts between a communication goal and another obligation.

conclusionClinicians and psychosocial professionals experience tensions that affect communication with parents in pediatric oncology. Some tensions might be addressed with interventions or education. Others will require further analysis to provide sufficient guidance to clinicians. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Unaddressed tensions might lead to poor communication and clinician burnout. Future work should explore solutions to these tensions.

Indexed as

GoalsNeoplasmsChildCommunicationHumansMedical OncologyParentsBarriersBioethicsCommunicationPediatric cancerPhysician-patient relationshipPsychosocial oncologySupportive care

Identifiers

PMID33992486
PMCPMC8978564
OpenAlexW3159848049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.