ArticleBMC plant biology2021
Comparative analysis of chloroplast genome structure and molecular dating in Myrtales.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stage-Specific RNA Turnover Drives Small RNA Dynamics inPlant direct · 2026Article
- The First Complete Chloroplast Genome ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes in the subtribe Leptoboeinae (Gesneriaceae).Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Epilobieae genomes and the evolution of Myrtales.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of EightCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Novel perspectives on plastome evolution in Onagraceae.AoB PLANTS · 2025Article
- Comparative and evolutionary analysis of chloroplast genomes from five rare Styrax species.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomic analysis of Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth 1844 and related species within Caesalpinioideae.Genetica · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of the Chloroplast Genomes of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Comparative chloroplast genome analysis of Ardisia (Myrsinoideae, Primulaceae) in China and implications for phylogenetic relationships and adaptive evolution.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Mitochondrial Genome Assembly and Structural Characteristics Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Deciphering the complete chloroplast genome sequence ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- Intraspecific Differentiation ofGenes · 2024Article
- Characterization, comparison, and phylogenetic analyses of chloroplast genomes of Euphorbia species.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Characterization of the chloroplast genome of Gleditsia species and comparative analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Phylogeny, biogeography, and character evolution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Complete Chloroplast Genomes ofCurrent genomics · 2023Article
- Assembly, annotation and analysis of the chloroplast genome of the Algarrobo tree Neltuma pallida (subfamily: Caesalpinioideae).BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- A comprehensive genus-level phylogeny and biogeographical history of the Lythraceae based on whole plastome sequences.Annals of botany · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyrtales is a species rich branch of Rosidae, with many species having important economic, medicinal, and ornamental value. At present, although there are reports on the chloroplast structure of Myrtales, a comprehensive analysis of the chloroplast structure of Myrtales is lacking. Phylogenetic and divergence time estimates of Myrtales are mostly constructed by using chloroplast gene fragments, and the support for relationships is low. A more reliable method to reconstruct the species divergence time and phylogenetic relationships is by using whole chloroplast genomes. In this study, we comprehensively analyzed the structural characteristics of Myrtales chloroplasts, compared variation hotspots, and reconstructed the species differentiation time of Myrtales with four fossils and one secondary calibration point.
resultsA total of 92 chloroplast sequences of Myrtales, representing six families, 16 subfamilies and 78 genera, were obtained including nine newly sequenced chloroplasts by whole genome sequencing. Structural analyses showed that the chloroplasts range in size between 152,214-171,315 bp and exhibit a typical four part structure. The IR region is between 23,901-36,747 bp, with the large single copy region spanning 83,691-91,249 bp and the small single copy region spanning 11,150-19,703 bp. In total, 123-133 genes are present in the chloroplasts including 77-81 protein coding genes, four rRNA genes and 30-31 tRNA genes. The GC content was 36.9-38.9%, with the average GC content being 37%. The GC content in the LSC, SSC and IR regions was 34.7-37.3%, 30.6-36.8% and 39.7-43.5%, respectively. By analyzing nucleotide polymorphism of the chloroplast, we propose 21 hypervariable regions as potential DNA barcode regions for Myrtales. Phylogenetic analyses showed that Myrtales and its corresponding families are monophyletic, with Combretaceae and the clade of Onagraceae + Lythraceae (BS = 100%, PP = 1) being sister groups. The results of molecular dating showed that the crown of Myrtales was most likely to be 104.90 Ma (95% HPD = 87.88-114.18 Ma), and differentiated from the Geraniales around 111.59 Ma (95% HPD = 95.50-118.62 Ma).
conclusionsThe chloroplast genome structure of Myrtales is similar to other angiosperms and has a typical four part structure. Due to the expansion and contraction of the IR region, the chloroplast genome sizes in this group are slightly different. The variation of noncoding regions of the chloroplast genome is larger than those of coding regions. Phylogenetic analysis showed that Combretaceae and Onagraceae + Lythraceae were well supported as sister groups. Molecular dating indicates that the Myrtales crown most likely originated during the Albian age of the Lower Cretaceous. These chloroplast genomes contribute to the study of genetic diversity and species evolution of Myrtales, while providing useful information for taxonomic and phylogenetic studies of Myrtales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.