Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33992095›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2021

Comparative analysis of chloroplast genome structure and molecular dating in Myrtales.

Xiao-Feng Zhang, Jacob B Landis, Hong-Xin Wang, Zhi-Xin Zhu, Hua-Feng Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The First Complete Chloroplast Genome ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative Analysis of the Chloroplast Genomes of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Mitochondrial Genome Assembly and Structural Characteristics Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Phylogeny, biogeography, and character evolution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  18. Complete Chloroplast Genomes ofCurrent genomics · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiao-Feng ZhangHainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresources, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Jacob B LandisSchool of Integrative Plant Science, Section of Plant Biology and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.
Hong-Xin WangHainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresources, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Zhi-Xin ZhuHainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresources, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China.
Hua-Feng WangHainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresources, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China. hfwang@hainanu.edu.cn.
Hainan University · CNIthaca College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyrtales is a species rich branch of Rosidae, with many species having important economic, medicinal, and ornamental value. At present, although there are reports on the chloroplast structure of Myrtales, a comprehensive analysis of the chloroplast structure of Myrtales is lacking. Phylogenetic and divergence time estimates of Myrtales are mostly constructed by using chloroplast gene fragments, and the support for relationships is low. A more reliable method to reconstruct the species divergence time and phylogenetic relationships is by using whole chloroplast genomes. In this study, we comprehensively analyzed the structural characteristics of Myrtales chloroplasts, compared variation hotspots, and reconstructed the species differentiation time of Myrtales with four fossils and one secondary calibration point.

resultsA total of 92 chloroplast sequences of Myrtales, representing six families, 16 subfamilies and 78 genera, were obtained including nine newly sequenced chloroplasts by whole genome sequencing. Structural analyses showed that the chloroplasts range in size between 152,214-171,315 bp and exhibit a typical four part structure. The IR region is between 23,901-36,747 bp, with the large single copy region spanning 83,691-91,249 bp and the small single copy region spanning 11,150-19,703 bp. In total, 123-133 genes are present in the chloroplasts including 77-81 protein coding genes, four rRNA genes and 30-31 tRNA genes. The GC content was 36.9-38.9%, with the average GC content being 37%. The GC content in the LSC, SSC and IR regions was 34.7-37.3%, 30.6-36.8% and 39.7-43.5%, respectively. By analyzing nucleotide polymorphism of the chloroplast, we propose 21 hypervariable regions as potential DNA barcode regions for Myrtales. Phylogenetic analyses showed that Myrtales and its corresponding families are monophyletic, with Combretaceae and the clade of Onagraceae + Lythraceae (BS = 100%, PP = 1) being sister groups. The results of molecular dating showed that the crown of Myrtales was most likely to be 104.90 Ma (95% HPD = 87.88-114.18 Ma), and differentiated from the Geraniales around 111.59 Ma (95% HPD = 95.50-118.62 Ma).

conclusionsThe chloroplast genome structure of Myrtales is similar to other angiosperms and has a typical four part structure. Due to the expansion and contraction of the IR region, the chloroplast genome sizes in this group are slightly different. The variation of noncoding regions of the chloroplast genome is larger than those of coding regions. Phylogenetic analysis showed that Combretaceae and Onagraceae + Lythraceae were well supported as sister groups. Molecular dating indicates that the Myrtales crown most likely originated during the Albian age of the Lower Cretaceous. These chloroplast genomes contribute to the study of genetic diversity and species evolution of Myrtales, while providing useful information for taxonomic and phylogenetic studies of Myrtales.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, ChloroplastGenome, PlantMolecular StructurePhylogenyWhole Genome SequencingMyrtalesAdaptive evolutionGenome structureMyrtalesPhylogenyPlastome

Identifiers

PMID33992095
PMCPMC8122561
OpenAlexW3161407506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.