Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33991973›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of emergency medicine2021

Influence of post-COVID-19 deconfinement on psychiatric visits to the emergency department.

Julien Flament, Nathan Scius, Nicolas Zdanowicz, Maxime Regnier, Louis De Cannière, Henri Thonon

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Utilization of mental health services during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic - a systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julien FlamentEmergency Department, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium. Electronic address: julien.flament@uclouvain.be.
Nathan SciusEmergency Department, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.
Nicolas ZdanowiczPsychopathology and Psychosomatic Unit, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.
Maxime RegnierStatistician, from the Scientific Support Unit of the CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.
Louis De CannièreEmergency Department, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.
Henri ThononEmergency Department, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.
CHU Dinant Godinne UCL Namur · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDuring the deconfinement period after the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the number and characteristics of psychiatric visits changed in our emergency department (ED). We aimed to assess changes in the number of visits and characterize the profiles of these patients.

methodsIn this retrospective observational study, we examined the number of psychiatric ED visits and their proportion among the total number of ED visits. We also evaluated psychiatric visits characteristics during a one-month period after the declaration of deconfinement, and we compared those characteristics to characteristics observed during the same month over the previous 4 years.

resultsThe number of psychiatric visits to our emergency department during deconfinement was similar to the number observed in the same month of previous years. However, the proportion of psychiatric visits to our emergency department among all visits to the ED rose during deconfinement to a level never before observed. The mean proportion of psychiatric admissions to all ED admissions rose from 3.5% in past years to 5.3% during deconfinement (p = 0.013). Moreover, during deconfinement, more visits (80%) were without an acute intoxication compared to past years (58.5%; p = 0.031). Also, in the deconfinement period, more visits lacked a follow-up consultation organized at discharge (40%) compared to the historical period (25%, p = 0.036).

conclusionsThe deconfinement period after the first wave COVID-19 changed the number and type of psychiatric emergency medicine consultations at our hospital, suggesting a psychiatric impact of confinement during this pandemic. These findings will be of interest to practitioners and politicians in the coming months.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Public PolicyAdultAftercareAlcoholic IntoxicationAnxietyBelgiumDepressionEmergenciesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersPersonality DisordersCOVID-19DeconfinementEmergencyPsychiatric

Identifiers

PMID33991973
PMCPMC8101003
OpenAlexW3158686181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.