ArticlePhysiological reports2021
Effects of smooth pursuit and second-order stimuli on visual motion prediction.
Article in Physiological reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Failure to replicate the Aubert-Fleischl effect.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether smooth pursuit eye movements affect visual motion prediction using a time-to-contact task where observers anticipate the exact instant that a partially occluded target would coincide with a stationary object. Moreover, we attempted to clarify the influence of second-order motion on visual motion prediction during smooth pursuit. One target object moved to another stationary object (6 deg apart) at constant velocity of 3, 4, and 5 deg/s, and then the two objects disappeared 500 ms after the onset of target motion. The observers estimated the moment the moving object would overlap the stationary object and pressed a button. For the pursuit condition, both a Gaussian window and a random dots texture moved in the same direction at the same speed for the first-order motion, whereas a Gaussian window moved over a static background composed of random dots texture for the second-order motion. The results showed that the constant error of the time-to-contact shifted to a later response for the pursuit condition compared to the fixation condition, regardless of the object velocity. In addition, during smooth pursuit, the constant error for the second-order motion shifted to an earlier response compared to the first-order motion when the object velocity was 3 deg/s, whereas no significant difference was found at 4 and 5 deg/s. Therefore, our results suggest that visual motion prediction using a time-to-contact task is affected by both eye movements and motion configuration such as second-order motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.