ArticleJournal of anatomy2021
The use of statistical modelling to identify important parameters for the shape of the torso following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spinal axial torque assessment after surgical correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new approach to 3D barycentremetry and mass distribution based on biplanar radiographs.Spine deformity · 2024Article
- Statistical modelling of how the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine is affected by adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and how scoliosis surgery changes that.Journal of anatomy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The surgical strategy in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) aims to recreate the symmetry of the torso. This requires the minimisation of both the size of the scoliosis and the angulation between the sides of the torso, along with the recreation of a normal thoracic kyphosis. This study uses predictive modelling to identify the significance of the value of the pre-operative parameters, and the change in the magnitude of the parameters as a result of an operation on the shape of the torso using the 'most prominent points'; two areas of maximum prominence on either side of the spine with x, y and z coordinates. The pre-operative values, and the change in magnitude between the pre and post-operative values, for scoliosis, kyphosis and skin angulation from a group of Lenke 1 convex to the right AIS were analysed with measures collected using Integrated Spine Imaging System 2 surface topography and compared with those without visible spinal deformity. The models best explained the z coordinate and least well explained the x coordinate, although there was a contribution to all of the models that remained unexplained. The parameters that affected the position of the coordinates in the model differed between the models. This confirms that surgically altering the shape of the spine and torso whilst correcting an AIS does not lead to a symmetrical torso. There are as yet, undefined factors which contribute to the shape of the torso and which if identified and corrected surgically would lead to greater symmetry post-operatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.