Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33991365›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2021

Headache teleconsultation in the era of COVID-19: Patients' evaluation and future directions.

Leonor Dias, Bárbara Martins, Maria João Pinto, Ana Luísa Rocha, Madalena Pinto, Andreia Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire for use in Brazil.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Telemedicine in Headache Medicine: A Narrative Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leonor DiasNeurology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2763-9440
Bárbara MartinsNeurology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3026-3453
Maria João PintoNeurology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9133-4441
Ana Luísa RochaNeurology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-8177
Madalena PintoNeurology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto, Portugal.
Andreia CostaNeurology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, E.P.E., Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5331-9934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeLiterature regarding headache teleconsultation and patient satisfaction is scarce. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to the restructuring of traditional clinical activity by adopting telemedicine. Our objectives were to evaluate patients' satisfaction with headache teleconsultation by telephone during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and assess patients' preferred model of appointment (face-to-face, teleconsultation by telephone, or both).

methodsPatients with a previous diagnosis of primary headache or neuropathies and facial pain disorders, and at least one telephone headache visit during the first wave of COVID-19, filled out an online questionnaire regarding sociodemographic parameters, satisfaction with teleconsultation, and preferred model of appointment.

resultsWe included 83 patients (valid response rate of 64.3%); most had migraine (83.1%). Regarding teleconsultation, 81.9% considered this model adequate for follow-up, 88.0% were satisfied with the information provided about the disease/treatment, and 73.5% were satisfied with the medication modification. Ninety percent would agree with a new tele-evaluation if stable after the pandemic. The mixed model was the preferred medical consultation type for the postpandemic period (43.4%), followed by face-to-face visits (33.7%).

conclusionsPatients were satisfied with the headache teleconsultation during the COVID-19 era. However, an exclusive model of telemedicine does not seem suitable for monitoring all patients. A mixed approach could be integrated into clinical practice after the pandemic to optimize health care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Remote ConsultationHeadacheHumansPatient SatisfactionSARS-CoV-2COVID-19primary headachesatisfactiontelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33991365
PMCPMC8239939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.