ArticleHead and neck pathology2021
Ameloblastic Fibro-Odontoma: At the Crossroad Between "Developing Odontoma" and True Odontogenic Tumour.
Article in Head and neck pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dilated Odontoma of the Mandible: A Rare Case Report with Discussion about the Differential Diagnosis.Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2026Article
- New Insights into Ameloblastic Fibromas, Fibrodentinomas, and Fibro-Odontomas: Findings from an International Multicenter Study.Head and neck pathology · 2025Article
- Ameloblastic Fibro-Odontoma with an FGFR1 Mutation: A Case Report.Head and neck pathology · 2025Article
- A rare case report of ameloblastic fibrodentinoma with imaging features in a pediatric patient.Imaging science in dentistry · 2024Article
- Reticular Myxoid Odontogenic Neoplasm with Novel STRN::ALK Fusion: Report of 2 Cases in 3-Year-Old Males.Head and neck pathology · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- An expansile presentation of focal cemento-osseous dysplasia of the mandible in a young girl.BJR case reports · 2023Article
- Ameloblastic Fibro-Odontoma: A Journey of Progression?Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP · 2022Article
- CDC7 Expression in Selected Odontogenic Tumors.International journal of dentistry · 2022Article
- The World Health Organization Classification of Odontogenic Lesions: A Summary of the Changes of the 2022 (5th) Edition.Turk patoloji dergisi · 2022Review
- Developing odontoma arising from calcifying odontogenic cyst: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2021Article
- Ameloblastic fibro‑odontoma in the posterior mandible: A case report.Medicine internationalArticle
- Ameloblastic Fibro-odontoma - A Case Report of Two Uncommon Cases.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ameloblastic fibro-odontoma (AFO) is a controversial, rare benign mixed odontogenic tumour that was re-defined as "developing odontoma" in the 2017 WHO classification arguing that once dental hard tissues form, it is programmed to transform into odontoma. However, AFO still remains unclear in terms of its nature. We aimed to analyze a large series of AFOs and compare it to a large series of odontomas (ODs) in an attempt to set cut-off diagnostic parameters between these entities and discuss latest updates on AFO histopathologic, clinical and molecular features. A total of 23 well-documented AFOs were analyzed versus 310 ODs focusing on the age of the patients and size of the lesions. For AFO, mean age was 9.4 ± 3.9 years (range 3-16 years) and mean size (greatest diameter) was 2.9 ± 1.5 cm (range 0.8-5.5 cm). For OD-mean age was 26.5 ± 15.6 years (range 3-81 years), mean size 1.9 ± 0.9 cm (range 1-5 cm). Receiver operating curve (ROC) showed that a cut-off age of 13.5 years and below [area under the curve (AUC) 0.902, 95%CI 0.859-0.945; p < 001; sensitivity 80%, specificity 87%] and a cut-off size of 2.1 cm and above are likely to be associated with AFO (AUC 0.7, 95%CI 0.574-0.827; p = 0.001; sensitivity 57%, specificity 77%). Thus, the combination of age and lesion size may be used to distinguish between lesions of a true neoplastic nature (i.e., AFO) and hamartomatous formation (i.e., OD). Further molecular and genetic specifications are needed to provide a better understanding on the pathogenesis of AFO in support of our suggestion and aid in an accurate classification of AFO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.