Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33991310›Full record

Trial reportIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2021

Evaluating the efficacy of nitazoxanide in uncomplicated amebic liver abscess.

Vasudha Goel, Anubhav Jain, Garima Sharma, Ashok Jhajharia, Vishnu Kumar Agarwal, Prachis Ashdhir, Rupesh Pokharna, Virender Chauhan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Amebic liver abscess: An update.World journal of hepatology · 2024
    Review
  3. Amebic liver abscess byWorld journal of clinical cases · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vasudha GoelDepartment of Gastroenterology, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur 302 004, India.
Anubhav JainDepartment of Gastroenterology, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur 302 004, India.
Garima SharmaDepartment of Pathology, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, 302 004, India.
Ashok JhajhariaDepartment of Gastroenterology, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur 302 004, India.
Vishnu Kumar AgarwalDepartment of Gastroenterology, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur 302 004, India.
Prachis AshdhirDepartment of Gastroenterology, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur 302 004, India. pa894@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3647-4569
Rupesh PokharnaDepartment of Gastroenterology, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur 302 004, India.
Virender ChauhanDepartment of Gastroenterology, SMS Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur 302 004, India.
SMS Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmebic liver abscess is treated successfully with metronidazole or another nitroimidazole drug followed by a luminal amebicide. Metronidazole has long been preferred, but has been associated with several adverse effects including intolerance in certain clinical situations. Mechanisms of metronidazole resistance and mutagenic potential have been described. Effects of the use of drug in pregnant women and infants of lactating women are unknown. Nitazoxanide was proven to be efficacious in treating invasive intestinal amebiasis. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide as compared to metronidazole in patients with uncomplicated amebic liver abscess.

methodsPatients with clinical and ultrasonography features suggestive of liver abscess, positive amebic serology, and/or anchovy sauce appearance on aspiration of the pus were included in the study and randomized into two parallel treatment groups. Group M received metronidazole, 2-2.5 g/day intravenous (IV), for inpatients, or 2-2.4 g/day oral, for outpatients in three divided doses for 14 days. Group N received nitazoxanide 500 mg BD per oral for 10 days.

resultsA total of sixty subjects fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomized equally into two groups, group M and group N. Number of patients achieving symptomatic clinical response (SCR) was similar in the two groups (80% vs. 76.7%, p = 1.00), though time to achieve symptomatic clinical response was significantly lower in metronidazole group as compared to that in nitazoxanide group. Greater proportion of patients achieved early clinical response (ECR) in metronidazole group as compared to nitazoxanide group. Complete resolution of abscess, at 6 months, was noted in 18 (60%) patients in the M group and 22 (73.3%) patients in the N group (p = 0.273). Metronidazole was associated with significantly greater frequency of adverse effects than nitazoxanide.

conclusionsThis study shows equivalent efficacy of nitazoxanide in uncomplicated amebic liver abscess as compared to metronidazole, with better tolerability and advantage of simultaneous luminal clearance, thus reducing chances of recurrence.

trial registrationCTRI/2019/01/017249.

Indexed as

Liver Abscess, AmebicFemaleHumansLactationMetronidazoleNitro CompoundsPregnancyThiazolesMetronidazolenitazoxanideNitro CompoundsThiazolesAdverse effectsAmebecideAmebic liver abscessEntamoeba histolyticaMetronidazoleNitazoxanide

Identifiers

PMID33991310
OpenAlexW3160874749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.