ArticleJournal of plant research2021
Influence of different types of explants in chickpea regeneration using thidiazuron seed-priming.
Article in Journal of plant research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- In vitro bioactive metabolite production and plant regeneration of medicinal plant Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Patent landscaping and citation network analysis to reveal the global research trends in biopriming using microbial inoculants: an insight toward sustainable agriculture.Biologia futura · 2023Article
- Seed Bio-priming of wheat with a novel bacterial strain to modulate drought stress in Daegu, South Korea.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Article
- PlantsFrontiers in plant science · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A comparative regeneration of three types of explants prepared from axillary meristems, plumular apices and hypocotyls of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) was carried out using four thidiazuron (TDZ) treatment methods. The first and third ones included the short-term 20 μM TDZ pre-treatment for all three explant types followed by non-supplementation or supplementation of TDZ (4 μM) into the shoot induction medium (SIM), while the second and fourth ones lacked TDZ pre-treatment followed by non-addition or addition of 4 μM TDZ in the SIM. Axillary meristem explants produced the best results with seed pre-treatment using 20 μM TDZ without TDZ in SIM and showed the highest rate of regeneration efficiency (71.33 ± 1.5%) after 20 days. Concurrently, plumular apex explants from TDZ-primed seeds was ranked second, exhibiting a regeneration percentage of 54.33 ± 2.3% in SIM without supplementation of TDZ, whereas explants from hypocotyls generated from seeds subjected to any of the TDZ treatments were not regenerated on any SIMs after 20 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.