ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Radiation dose and diagnostic reference levels for four interventional radiology procedures: results of the prospective European multicenter survey EUCLID.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- From standardization to excellence: rethinking diagnostic reference levels in interventional neuroradiology.European radiology · 2026Article
- International survey in four European countries on diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Patient radiation doses in an angiography suite at a tertiary hospital in Pretoria.Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Radiology Services and Occupational Radiation Anxiety in Kazakhstan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Current practices and perceptions on diagnostic reference levels: a EuroSafe Imaging Survey Analysis.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- International survey on diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications in plain radiography.European radiology · 2025Article
- Analysis of ionizing radiation doses received by patients during electrocardiological procedures.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- National UK Survey of Radiation Doses During Endovascular Aortic Interventions.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024Article
- Cumulative Effective Dose During Fluoroscopically Guided Interventions (FGI): Analysis of More Than 5000 FGIs in a Single European Center.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024Article
- Optimized radiological alert thresholds based on device-dosimetric information to predict peak skin dose between 2 and 4 Gy during vascular fluoroscopically guided intervention.European radiology · 2023Article
- Added Value of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Detecting Hepatocellular Carcinomas and Feeding Arteries during Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Focusing on Radiation Exposure.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- An audit of patient radiation doses in interventional radiology at a South African hospital.SA journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Application of reference air kerma alert levels for pediatric fluoroscopic examinations.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- THE EFFECTS OF CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING GUIDANCE ON PATIENT RADIATION EXPOSURES IN TRANS-ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLISATION FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2022Article
- Radiation exposure in 101 non-coronary fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: reference levels of air kerma at the reference point and air kerma area product.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage to reduce radiation exposure: A single-center experience.PloS one · 2022Article
- Diagnostic reference levels in interventional radiology: a systematic review.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess information reflecting radiation dose and define diagnostic reference levels (DRL) on a European basis for four interventional radiology (IR) procedures considering clinical indication, anatomical region, and procedure.
methodsA prospective European study was performed to provide data on the IR procedures percutaneous recanalization of iliac arteries, percutaneous recanalization of femoropopliteal arteries, transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma, and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Hospitals were asked to complete a questionnaire giving information on procedure, equipment, and protocol. Patient size and weight, experience of the operator graded in number of procedures performed, and complexity level of each procedure were reported. Sixteen hospitals from 13 countries could be surveyed. The percentiles of the kerma-area product, fluoroscopy time, cumulative air kerma at the interventional reference point, and number of images were determined. The impact of equipment, year of installation, and complexity level of the procedure on dose were analyzed.
resultsDRLs based on clinical indication were defined. Dose values varied considerably within hospitals, between them, and within each subgroup of complexity level. The use of state-of-the-art equipment reduced dose significantly by 52%. Although dose also varied within each subgroup of complexity level, for transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, dose significantly correlated with complexity.
conclusionsThis was the first study reporting exposure practice and defining DRLs based on clinical indication for four IR procedures on a European basis. These DRLs can serve as a baseline for comparison with local practice, the study as a guideline for future surveys. KEY POINTS: • The use of state-of-the-art angiographic equipment reduces dose significantly. • A significant correlation between radiation dose and complexity level is found. • Dose values vary considerably, both within and between individual hospitals, and within each complexity level of interventional radiology procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33991223What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.