ArticlePediatric surgery international2021
Topical corticosteroids for phimosis in children: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of low to moderate potency topical corticosteroids for phimosis resolution in children: results of a network meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCorticosteroids and hyaluronidase are trialed for treating phimosis in children. We carried out the present network meta-analysis to compare the therapeutic effect of these drugs.
methodsElectronic databases were searched for appropriate randomized clinical trials. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was used as the effect estimate. A random-effects model was used for generating the pooled estimates. Rankogram plot was used for ranking the drugs.
main outcome measuresProportions of patients with remission (partial/complete) and with complete remission.
resultsMometasone (OR 6.53, 95% CI 2.85, 14.96), betamethasone/hyaluronidase (OR 12.1, 95% CI 4.27, 34.49), triamcinolone (OR 19.15, 95% CI 4.47, 81.96), dexamethasone (OR 21.38, 95% CI 5.71, 79.98), betamethasone (OR 23.02, 95% CI 6.92, 79.54), hydrocortisone (OR 23.2, 95% CI 5.91, 91.02) and methylprednisolone (OR 50.47, 95% CI 4.45, 572.72) were observed with significantly higher proportions of patients with remission (partial/complete) compared to placebo. Dexamethasone, triamcinolone, betamethasone, betamethasone/hyaluronidase, clobetasol, mometasone, and hydrocortisone were observed with significantly higher proportions of patients with complete remission compared to placebo. Beclomethasone was not observed to be superior to either placebo or other drugs. Rankogram plot revealed methylprednisolone followed by hydrocortisone had the maximum statistical probability of being 'the best' in the pool for remission and betamethasone followed by hydrocortisone for complete remission.
conclusionTopical methylprednisolone, hydrocortisone, and betamethasone were observed with better clinical resolution of phimosis compared to other corticosteroids. Very high potent corticosteroids like beclomethasone and clobetasol were not observed with superior benefits compared to other corticosteroids. Considering low-potency, hydrocortisone shall be preferred until further evidence emerges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.