Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33991112›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2021

One-year results of the Variation of Orthokeratology Lens Treatment Zone (VOLTZ) Study: a prospective randomised clinical trial.

Biyue Guo, Sin Wan Cheung, Randy Kojima, Pauline Cho

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05348369 (The Relationship of Relative Corneal Refractive Power Shift and Axial Length in Adolescents With Orthokeratology Lens), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05348369 completednot on this map

The Relationship of Relative Corneal Refractive Power Shift and Axial Length in Adolescents With Orthokeratology Lens

TypeobservationalSponsorTianjin Eye HospitalRan2018 to 2019Enrolled364ConditionsMyopia, Orthokeratology
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. [Effect of Back Optical Zone Diameter of Orthokeratology Lens on Visual Quality in Myopic Children].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. One-year results of the Variation of Orthokeratology Lens Treatment Zone (VOLTZ) Study: a prospective randomised clinical trial.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2021
    Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effect of Switching Myopia Control Strategies on Axial Elongation in Children with Poor Response to Highly Aspherical Lenslet Therapy.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Biyue GuoCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6282-8143
Sin Wan CheungCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Randy KojimaCollege of Optometry, Pacific University, Oregon, USA.
Pauline ChoCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7866-7513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo present the 1-year results of the Variation of Orthokeratology Lens Treatment Zone (VOLTZ) Study, which aims to investigate the myopia control effect of orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses with different back optic zone diameters (BOZD).

methodChildren, aged 6 to <11 years, having myopia -4.00 D to -0.75 D, were randomly assigned to wear ortho-k lenses with 6 mm (6-MM group) or 5 mm (5-MM group) BOZD. Data collection included changes in refraction, vision, lens performance and binding, ocular health conditions, axial length and characteristics of the treatment zone (TZ) area.

resultsThe 1-year results of 34 and 36 subjects (right eye only) in the 6-MM and 5-MM groups, respectively, are presented. No significant differences in baseline demographics were found between the groups (p > 0.05). The first-fit success rates, based on satisfactory centration at the 1-month visit, were 100% and 94% respectively. Horizontal TZ size was 0.92 mm and 0.72 mm smaller in the 5-MM group at the 6-month and 12-month visits, respectively (p < 0.05). At the 12-month visit, no significant between-group differences were found in the incidence of corneal staining (low grade only), lens binding and visual performance (all p > 0.05). Axial elongation was slower in the 5-MM group (0.04 ± 0.15 mm) than the 6-MM group (0.17 ± 0.13 mm) (p = 0.001). A significant positive correlation was observed between the horizontal TZ size and axial elongation (r = 0.36, p = 0.006).

conclusionClinical performance of the two ortho-k lenses was similar, indicating that a smaller BOZD (5 mm) did not affect lens performance or ocular integrity. However, a smaller BOZD led to a reduced TZ, with retardation of axial elongation by 0.13 mm compared to conventional 6 mm BOZD ortho-k lenses after one year of lens wear.

Indexed as

Contact LensesMyopiaOrthokeratologic ProceduresAxial Length, EyeChildCorneal TopographyHumansProspective StudiesRefraction, OcularBOZDmyopia controlorthokeratologytreatment zone

Identifiers

PMID33991112
PMCPMC8251614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.