Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33991006›Full record

ArticleChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2021

(Automated) Synthesis of Well-defined Staphylococcus Aureus Wall Teichoic Acid Fragments.

Sara Ali, Astrid Hendriks, Rob van Dalen, Thomas Bruyning, Nico Meeuwenoord, Herman S Overkleeft, Dmitri V Filippov, Gijs A van der Marel, Nina M van Sorge, Jeroen D C Codée

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. InvasiveScience advances · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Antibody Recognition of DifferentACS central science · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sara AliLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden (The, Netherlands.
Astrid HendriksMedical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht (The, Netherlands.
Rob van DalenMedical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht (The, Netherlands.
Thomas BruyningLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden (The, Netherlands.
Nico MeeuwenoordLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden (The, Netherlands.
Herman S OverkleeftLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden (The, Netherlands.
Dmitri V FilippovLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden (The, Netherlands.
Gijs A van der MarelLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden (The, Netherlands.
Nina M van SorgeMedical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht (The, Netherlands.
Jeroen D C CodéeLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden (The, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3531-2138

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 09150181910001Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 91713303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wall teichoic acids (WTAs) are important components of the cell wall of the opportunistic Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus. WTAs are composed of repeating ribitol phosphate (RboP) residues that are decorated with d-alanine and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (GlcNAc) modifications, in a seemingly random manner. These WTA-modifications play an important role in shaping the interactions of WTA with the host immune system. Due to the structural heterogeneity of WTAs, it is impossible to isolate pure and well-defined WTA molecules from bacterial sources. Therefore, here synthetic chemistry to assemble a broad library of WTA-fragments, incorporating all possible glycosylation modifications (α-GlcNAc at the RboP C4; β-GlcNAc at the RboP C4; β-GlcNAc at the RboP C3) described for S. aureus WTAs, is reported. DNA-type chemistry, employing ribitol phosphoramidite building blocks, protected with a dimethoxy trityl group, was used to efficiently generate a library of WTA-hexamers. Automated solid phase syntheses were used to assemble a WTA-dodecamer and glycosylated WTA-hexamer. The synthetic fragments have been fully characterized and diagnostic signals were identified to discriminate the different glycosylation patterns. The different glycosylated WTA-fragments were used to probe binding of monoclonal antibodies using WTA-functionalized magnetic beads, revealing the binding specificity of these WTA-specific antibodies and the importance of the specific location of the GlcNAc modifications on the WTA-chains.

Indexed as

Staphylococcal InfectionsTeichoic AcidsCell WallGlycosylationHumansStaphylococcus aureusTeichoic Acidsantibodiesautomated synthesisgram-positive bacteriaribitol phosphatewall teichoic acids

Identifiers

PMID33991006
PMCPMC8361686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.