Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33990954›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology and bioengineering2021

Technological tools and strategies for culturing human gut microbiota in engineered in vitro models.

Lorenzo Sardelli, Simone Perottoni, Marta Tunesi, Lucia Boeri, Federica Fusco, Paola Petrini, Diego Albani, Carmen Giordano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Building and regenerating intestines by manipulating intestinal stem cells.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  2. AnmSystems · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Bio-Assay-Guided Study ofNutrients · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lorenzo SardelliDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta," Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6925-9390
Simone PerottoniDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta," Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1640-2170
Marta TunesiDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta," Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2507-6186
Lucia BoeriDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta," Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7334-837X
Federica FuscoDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta," Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6157-9146
Paola PetriniDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta," Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5081-5254
Diego AlbaniDepartment of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7050-6723
Carmen GiordanoDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta," Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8172-5940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota directly impacts the pathophysiology of different human body districts. Consequently, microbiota investigation is an hot topic of research and its in vitro culture has gained extreme interest in different fields. However, the high sensitivity of microbiota to external stimuli, such as sampling procedure, and the physicochemical complexity of the gut environment make its in vitro culture a challenging task. New engineered microfluidic gut-on-a-chip devices have the potential to model some important features of the intestinal structure, but they are usually unable to sustain culture of microbiota over an extended period of time. The integration of gut-on-a-chip devices with bioreactors for continuous bacterial culture would lead to fast advances in the study of microbiota-host crosstalk. In this review, we summarize the main technologies for the continuous culture of microbiota as upstream systems to be coupled with microfluidic devices to study bacteria-host cells communication. The engineering of integrated microfluidic platforms, capable of sustaining both anaerobic and aerobic cultures, would be the starting point to unveil complex biological phenomena proper of the microbiota-host crosstalks, paving to way to multiple research and technological applications.

Indexed as

BioreactorsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrofluidicsHumansanaerobiosisbioreactorsgut-brain axismicrofluidic systemsorgan-on-a-chip

Identifiers

PMID33990954
PMCPMC8361989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.