Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33990951›Full record

Trial reportHeadache2021

Phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled study of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in Japanese patients.

Fumihiko Sakai, Takao Takeshima, Gosuke Homma, Yuka Tanji, Hideaki Katagiri, Mika Komori

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Headache, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03962738 (RandoMized, DOuble-bliNd, PlacebO-coNtrolled Trial Of Lasmiditan in a Single Migraine Attack in Japanese Patients SuFfering From Migraine With or WithoUt Aura - the MONONOFU Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03962738 phase2completednot on this map

RandoMized, DOuble-bliNd, PlacebO-coNtrolled Trial Of Lasmiditan in a Single Migraine Attack in Japanese Patients SuFfering From Migraine With or WithoUt Aura - the MONONOFU Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2019 to 2020Enrolled846ConditionsMigraineArmsLasmiditan, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Efficacy of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of perimenstrual migraine.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The 5-HTNature reviews. Neurology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fumihiko SakaiSaitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Saitama, Japan.
Takao TakeshimaDepartment of Neurology, Tominaga Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Gosuke HommaEli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6854-5627
Yuka TanjiEli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.
Hideaki KatagiriEli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.
Mika KomoriEli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.
Eli Lilly (Japan) · JPTominaga hospital · JP

Funding

Eli Lilly Japan KK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan in Japanese adults with migraine.

backgroundGlobal clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan in the acute treatment of migraine.

methodsThis was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study in Japan (NCT03962738), which enrolled adults with migraine with or without aura. Participants were randomized 7:3:7:6 to placebo, lasmiditan 50 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg to be self-administered orally within 4 h of onset of a single moderate-to-severe migraine attack. Participants recorded their response to treatment prior to dosing and for 48 h postdose. The primary endpoint was headache pain freedom at 2 h postdose.

resultsParticipants (N = 846) were randomized and treated (N = 691, safety; N = 682, modified intent-to-treat). At 2 h postdose, a significantly higher proportion of participants were headache pain-free in the lasmiditan 200 mg (40.8%, 73/179; odds ratio 3.46 [95% confidence interval 2.17 to 5.54]; p < 0.001; primary objective) and 100 mg groups (32.4%, 67/207; odds ratio 2.41 [1.51 to 3.83]; p < 0.001) compared with the placebo group (16.6%, 35/211), whereas the lasmiditan 50 mg group had a numerically higher proportion of participants headache pain-free (23.5%, 20/85; odds ratio 1.55 [0.83 to 2.87]; p = 0.167) compared with placebo. A statistically significant linear dose-response relationship for pain freedom was achieved at 2 h by a Cochran-Armitage trend test (p < 0.001). Lasmiditan treatment was also associated with headache pain relief, most bothersome symptom freedom, and improvement on disability and Patient Global Impression of Change outcomes. The majority of treatment-emergent adverse events were mild and of short duration, the most common of which were dizziness (39.4%; 188/477), somnolence (19.3%; 92/477), and malaise (10.5%; 50/477) in all lasmiditan groups, with no serious adverse events reported.

conclusionsLasmiditan was well tolerated and effective for the acute treatment of Japanese patients with migraine, consistent with global phase 3 studies.

Indexed as

AdultBenzamidesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersPiperidinesPyridinesSerotonin Receptor AgonistsTreatment OutcomeBenzamideslasmiditanPiperidinesPyridinesSerotonin Receptor Agonists5-HT1F-receptoracute treatmentheadachelasmiditanmigrainephase 2

Identifiers

PMID33990951
PMCPMC8252620
OpenAlexW3160619081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.