Trial reportHeadache2021
Phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled study of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in Japanese patients.
Trial report in Headache, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03962738 (RandoMized, DOuble-bliNd, PlacebO-coNtrolled Trial Of Lasmiditan in a Single Migraine Attack in Japanese Patients SuFfering From Migraine With or WithoUt Aura - the MONONOFU Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
RandoMized, DOuble-bliNd, PlacebO-coNtrolled Trial Of Lasmiditan in a Single Migraine Attack in Japanese Patients SuFfering From Migraine With or WithoUt Aura - the MONONOFU Study
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy of AAC and ibuprofen versus lasmiditan, ubrogepant, and rimegepant for the acute treatment of episodic migraine in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant for acute treatment of migraine in triptan insufficient responders: systematic review and network meta-analysis.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan and CGRP-antagonists for the acute treatment of migraine in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Receptor Antagonists and Selective Serotonin Receptor Agonist in the Management of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024Pooled it
- Relative efficacy of lasmiditan versus rimegepant and ubrogepant as acute treatments for migraine: network meta-analysis findings.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Pooled it
- Lasmiditan abortive therapy for episodic migraine in Phase II/III randomized clinical trials: A meta-analysis.Indian journal of pharmacologyPooled it
- Long-term treatment with lasmiditan in patients with migraine: post hoc analysis of treatment patterns and outcomes from the open-label extension of the CENTURION randomized trial.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Trial
- Lasmiditan in Japanese Patients with Common Migraine Comorbidities or Concomitant Medications: A Post Hoc Safety and Efficacy Analysis from the MONONOFU Study.Journal of pain research · 2023Trial
- Efficacy of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of perimenstrual migraine.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022Trial
- Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Lasmiditan in Patients with Migraine: A Post-Marketing Observational Study in Japan.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Migraine Management in Japan: Current Approaches and Science Narrative Including an Evidence-based Review.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Review
- Identifying Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Lasmiditan 50 mg as an Acute Treatment for Migraine Attacks Under Various Dosing Conditions in Real-World Clinical Practice.Neurology international · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and tolerability of lasmiditan in the acute treatment of migraine: a real-world, prospective, multicentric study (DART study).Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Time-series clustering analysis for treatment pattern of lasmiditan for 2 years from the initial prescription.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Lasmiditan as a Secondary Treatment for Migraine Attacks after Unsuccessful Treatment with a Triptan.Neurology international · 2024Article
- Developing an Artificial Intelligence-Based Pediatric and Adolescent Migraine Diagnostic Model.Cureus · 2023Article
- The 5-HTNature reviews. Neurology · 2023Review
- Headache Education by E-Learning Through Social Networking Services (Social Media).Journal of healthcare leadership · 2023Article
- Profile of Lasmiditan in the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adults: Design, Development, and Place in Therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2023Review
- New Oral Drugs for Migraine.CNS drugs · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan in Japanese adults with migraine.
backgroundGlobal clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan in the acute treatment of migraine.
methodsThis was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study in Japan (NCT03962738), which enrolled adults with migraine with or without aura. Participants were randomized 7:3:7:6 to placebo, lasmiditan 50 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg to be self-administered orally within 4 h of onset of a single moderate-to-severe migraine attack. Participants recorded their response to treatment prior to dosing and for 48 h postdose. The primary endpoint was headache pain freedom at 2 h postdose.
resultsParticipants (N = 846) were randomized and treated (N = 691, safety; N = 682, modified intent-to-treat). At 2 h postdose, a significantly higher proportion of participants were headache pain-free in the lasmiditan 200 mg (40.8%, 73/179; odds ratio 3.46 [95% confidence interval 2.17 to 5.54]; p < 0.001; primary objective) and 100 mg groups (32.4%, 67/207; odds ratio 2.41 [1.51 to 3.83]; p < 0.001) compared with the placebo group (16.6%, 35/211), whereas the lasmiditan 50 mg group had a numerically higher proportion of participants headache pain-free (23.5%, 20/85; odds ratio 1.55 [0.83 to 2.87]; p = 0.167) compared with placebo. A statistically significant linear dose-response relationship for pain freedom was achieved at 2 h by a Cochran-Armitage trend test (p < 0.001). Lasmiditan treatment was also associated with headache pain relief, most bothersome symptom freedom, and improvement on disability and Patient Global Impression of Change outcomes. The majority of treatment-emergent adverse events were mild and of short duration, the most common of which were dizziness (39.4%; 188/477), somnolence (19.3%; 92/477), and malaise (10.5%; 50/477) in all lasmiditan groups, with no serious adverse events reported.
conclusionsLasmiditan was well tolerated and effective for the acute treatment of Japanese patients with migraine, consistent with global phase 3 studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.