Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33990914›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2021

Revisiting Astrocytic Roles in Methylmercury Intoxication.

Gabriela de Paula Arrifano, Marcus Augusto-Oliveira, José Rogério Souza-Monteiro, Barbarella de Matos Macchi, Rafael Rodrigues Lima, Cristina Suñol, José Luis Martins do Nascimento, Maria Elena Crespo-Lopez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Editorial: The outcomes of pollutants on glia.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Global Human Threat: The Potential Synergism between Mercury Intoxication and COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriela de Paula Arrifano *Laboratório de Farmacologia Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, 66075-110, Brazil. gabrielaarrifano@uol.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2817-3539
Marcus Augusto-Oliveira *Laboratório de Farmacologia Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, 66075-110, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4772-9929
José Rogério Souza-MonteiroFaculdade de Medicina, Campus de Altamira, Universidade Federal do Pará, Altamira, PA, 68372-040, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-7312
Barbarella de Matos MacchiLaboratório de Neuroquímica Molecular e Celular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, 66075-110, Brazil.
Rafael Rodrigues LimaLaboratório de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, 66075-110, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1486-4013
Cristina SuñolInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Barcelona. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IIBB - CSIC; IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-8483
José Luis Martins do NascimentoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP, 68903-419, Brazil.
Maria Elena Crespo-LopezLaboratório de Farmacologia Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, 66075-110, Brazil. maria.elena.crespo.lopez@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1335-6853
Universidade Federal do Pará · BRConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESUniversidade Federal do Amapá · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intoxication by heavy metals such as methylmercury (MeHg) is recognized as a global health problem, with strong implications in central nervous system pathologies. Most of these neuropathological conditions involve vascular, neurotransmitter recycling, and oxidative balance disruption leading to accelerated decline in fine balance, and learning, memory, and visual processes as main outcomes. Besides neurons, astrocytes are involved in virtually all the brain processes and perform important roles in neurological response following injuries. Due to astrocytes' strategic functions in brain homeostasis, these cells became the subject of several studies on MeHg intoxication. The most heterogenous glial cells, astrocytes, are composed of plenty of receptors and transporters to dialogue with neurons and other cells and to monitor extracellular environment responding tightly through fluctuation of cytosolic ions. The overall toxicity of MeHg might be determined on the basis of the balance between MeHg-mediated injury to neurons and protective responses from astrocytes. Although the role of neurons in MeHg intoxication is relatively well-established, the role of the astrocytes is only beginning to be understood. In this review, we update the information on astroglial modulation of the MeHg-induced neurotoxicity, providing remarks on their protective and deleterious roles and insights for future studies.

Indexed as

AstrocytesBrainHumansMethylmercury CompoundsNeuronsNeurotoxicity SyndromesMethylmercury CompoundsAstrogliaBrainGliaHumanMercuryMetalPollutant

Identifiers

PMID33990914
OpenAlexW3161162459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.