Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33990882›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Difficulties encountered by physicians and mental health professionals in evaluating and caring for affective and behavioral problems in pediatric brain tumor survivors.

Clémentine Lopez, Serge Sultan, Kristopher Lamore, Christelle Dufour, Estelle Favré, Léonor Fasse, Cécile Flahault

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Clémentine LopezPsycho-Oncology Unit, Gustave Roussy, 114, Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif Cedex, France. clementine.lopez@gustaveroussy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5595-3111
Serge SultanHematology-Oncology Department, Sainte-Justine UHC, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Kristopher LamoreLaboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, Université de Paris, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Christelle DufourDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Estelle FavréPsycho-Oncology Unit, Gustave Roussy, 114, Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif Cedex, France.
Léonor FassePsycho-Oncology Unit, Gustave Roussy, 114, Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif Cedex, France.
Cécile FlahaultPsycho-Oncology Unit, Gustave Roussy, 114, Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif Cedex, France.
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) present a high risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. When addressing these difficulties, differences in study designs; variety of and disagreement about diagnoses; and intricate links of emotional, behavioral, and cognitive issues may complicate the interpretation of studies and probably also the work of clinicians. We aimed to survey the difficulties perceived by physicians and mental health professionals in their practice and their interest in developing a new evaluative tool. METHODOLOGY: We surveyed 29 health professionals involved in the follow-up of this population. They completed questionnaires about their clinical practice (difficulties, needs, activities) and indicated diagnosis hypotheses and treatment plans on a clinical case developed for this study.

resultsEmotional and behavioral disorders were reported as difficult to assess for 93% of participants. The overlap of symptoms (90%) and the lack of an adapted diagnostic framework (90%) were the main reasons mentioned. Respectively 93%, 90%, and 65% of participants would at least "often" make referrals to psychological (93%), neuropsychological (90%), and psychiatric (65%) assessments and care. Family and group therapy were less common as was drug management. All participants were in favor of creating a tool to help with diagnosis and treatment. When responding to a clinical case, the heterogeneity of participants' responses highlighted their issues in diagnosing and managing these patients.

conclusionThis survey exemplifies the difficulties of health professionals related to the evaluation and management of affective and behavioral disorders experienced by PBTS. It underlines the need to help professionals by initiating systematic assessment strategies with this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsPhysiciansProblem BehaviorChildHumansMental HealthSurvivorsAffective symptomsBehavioral symptomsBrain neoplasmChildrenNeurocognitive disordersPediatric cancerProfessional practicePsychosocial careSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID33990882
OpenAlexW3161425151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.