Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33990846›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

Moving the goalposts while scoring-the dilemma posed by new PET technologies.

Julian M M Rogasch, Ronald Boellaard, Lucy Pike, Peter Borchmann, Peter Johnson, Jürgen Wolf, Sally F Barrington, Carsten Kobe

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. New PET technologies - embracing progress and pushing the limits.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  10. Give to Fryback what is Fryback's, and to new PET technologies what is new PET technologies'.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julian M M RogaschDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Ronald BoellaardRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lucy PikeKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK.
Peter BorchmannGerman Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Peter JohnsonCancer Research UK Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jürgen WolfDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University Hospital Cologne and University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sally F BarringtonKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK.
Carsten KobeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. carsten.kobe@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2909-0826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyHumans

Identifiers

PMID33990846
PMCPMC8263433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.