Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33990695›Full record

GuidelineJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2021

Treatment of positive urine cultures in the neonatal intensive care unit: a guideline to reduce antibiotic utilization.

Daniel P Gorski, Adam S Bauer, Nina S Menda, Matthew W Harer

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Urinary tract infection in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Urinary tract infections in very premature neonates: the definition dilemma.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel P GorskiDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Adam S BauerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7735-876X
Nina S MendaDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Matthew W HarerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. mwharer@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5493-3269
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pediatric definition of bacterial urinary tract infection (UTI) is >50,000 colony forming units (CFU) of a single organism on catheterized culture or 10,000-50,000 CFU with pyuria on urinalysis. LOCAL PROBLEM: The diagnosis of UTI in our NICU is clinician-dependent and not based on the accepted pediatric definition.

methodsA retrospective review of positive urine cultures between 2015 and 2017 was performed.

interventionA treatment guideline for positive urine cultures was adopted and PDSA methodology utilized for incremental improvements.

resultsFor 909 pre-intervention neonates, 26 of 38 positive urine cultures were treated for UTI but only 23% (6/26) met the pediatric definition. For 644 post-guideline neonates, only 7 of 25 positive urine cultures were treated and 86% met guideline criteria with no increase in urosepsis.

conclusionsA guideline to treat positive urine cultures resulted in a decreased rate of UTI diagnosis and thus prevented unnecessary antibiotic exposure.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalUrinalysisAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildHumansInfant, NewbornRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID33990695
OpenAlexW3163107139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.