Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33990648›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

A randomized clinical trial evaluating the short-term results of ureteral stent encrustation in urolithiasis patients undergoing ureteroscopy: micro-computed tomography evaluation.

Takashi Yoshida, Kuniko Takemoto, Yoshiko Sakata, Tomoaki Matsuzaki, Yuya Koito, Shimpei Yamashita, Isao Hara, Hidefumi Kinoshita, Tadashi Matsuda

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Silicone vs. Polyurethane Stent: The Final Countdown.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  11. AnFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takashi YoshidaDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shin-machi, Hirakata, 573-1152, Japan. yoshidtk@takii.kmu.ac.jp.
Kuniko TakemotoDepartment of Physics, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshiko SakataCentral Research of Laboratory, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoaki MatsuzakiDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shin-machi, Hirakata, 573-1152, Japan.
Yuya KoitoDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kori Hospital, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Shimpei YamashitaDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Isao HaraDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Hidefumi KinoshitaDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shin-machi, Hirakata, 573-1152, Japan.
Tadashi MatsudaDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shin-machi, Hirakata, 573-1152, Japan.
Kansai Medical University · JPWakayama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many ureteral stents are commercially available, the actuality of encrustation is yet to be elucidated in humans. This study compared the Tria Ureteral Stent with PercuShield and the Polaris Ultra Ureteral Stent with HydroPlus Coating for short-term encrustation formation. Eighty-four patients, who required ureteral stent placement after ureteroscopy, were randomized into two stent groups. After stent removal on postoperative day 14, the encrustation volume on the stent surface was measured by micro-computed tomography. The primary outcome was the inner luminal encrustation volume. Secondary outcomes were encrustation volume on the outer or total surfaces and occurrence of adverse events. Clinical factors related to encrustation were also assessed as a post-hoc analysis. Finally, of the 82 patients analyzed, 75 (91.5%) had encrustation in the inner lumen of the stent. The difference in median inner encrustation volume between the Tria and Polaris Ultra stents was comparable (0.56 vs. 0.37 mm

Indexed as

AgedDevice RemovalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStentsUreterUreteroscopyUrolithiasisX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID33990648
PMCPMC8121799
OpenAlexW3160771887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.