Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33990360›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2021

Quality of care for tuberculosis and HIV in the private health sector: a cross-sectional, standardised patient study in South Africa.

Jody Boffa, Sizulu Moyo, Jeremiah Chikovore, Angela Salomon, Benjamin Daniels, Ada T Kwan, Madhukar Pai, Amrita Daftary

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jody BoffaDahdaleh Institute of Global Health Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8183-6461
Sizulu MoyoHuman and Social Capabilities Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jeremiah ChikovoreHuman and Social Capabilities Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4910-6952
Angela SalomonMcGill International TB Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Benjamin DanielsInternational Public Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9652-6653
Ada T KwanDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Madhukar PaiMcGill International TB Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3667-4536
Amrita DaftaryDahdaleh Institute of Global Health Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada adaftary@yorku.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2275-3540
Human Sciences Research Council · ZAMcGill University · CAYork University · CAGeorgetown University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSouth Africa has high burdens of tuberculosis (TB) and TB-HIV, yet the quality of patient care in the private sector is unknown. We describe quality of TB and TB-HIV care among private general practitioners (GPs) in two South African cities using standardised patients (SPs).

methodsSixteen SPs presented one of three cases during unannounced visits to private GPs in selected high-TB burden communities in Durban and Cape Town: case 1, typical TB symptoms, HIV-positive; case 2, TB-specified laboratory report, HIV-negative and case 3, history of incomplete TB treatment, HIV-positive. Clinical practices were recorded in standardised exit interviews. Ideal management was defined as relevant testing or public sector referral for any reason. The difference between knowledge and practice (know-do gap) was assessed through case 1 vignettes among 25% of GPs. Factors associated with ideal management were assessed using bivariate logistic regression.

results511 SP visits were completed with 212 GPs. Respectively, TB and HIV were ideally managed in 43% (95% CI 36% to 50%) and 41% (95% CI 34% to 48%) of case 1, 85% (95% CI 78% to 90%) and 61% (95% CI 73% to 86%) of case 2 and 69% (95% CI 61% to 76%) and 80% (95% CI 52% to 68%) of case 3 presentations. HIV status was queried in 35% (95% CI 31% to 39%) of visits, least with case 1 (24%, 95% CI 18% to 30%). The difference between knowledge and practice was 80% versus 43% for TB and 55% versus 37% for HIV, resulting in know-do gaps of 37% (95% CI 19% to 55%) and 18% (95% CI -1% to 38%), respectively. Ideal TB management was associated with longer visit time (OR=1.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.2), female GPs (3.2, 95% CI 2.0 to 5.1), basic symptom inquiry (2.0, 95% CI 1.7 to 2.3), HIV-status inquiry (OR=11.2, 95% CI 6.4 to 19.6), fewer medications dispensed (OR=0.6, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.7) and Cape Town (OR=2.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.1). Similar associations were observed for HIV.

conclusionsPrivate providers ideally managed TB more often when a diagnosis or history of TB was implied or provided. Management of HIV in the context of TB was less than optimal.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsTuberculosisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPrivate SectorSouth Africacross-sectional surveyepidemiologyhealth services researchHIVtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID33990360
PMCPMC8127976
OpenAlexW3162222460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.