Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33990315›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2021

Comparison of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates from Urban Raccoons and Domestic Dogs.

Katherine E L Worsley-Tonks, Stanley D Gehrt, Elizabeth A Miller, Randall S Singer, Jeff B Bender, James D Forester, Shane C McKenzie, Dominic A Travis, Timothy J Johnson, Meggan E Craft

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine E L Worsley-TonksDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Stanley D GehrtSchool of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Elizabeth A MillerDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Randall S SingerDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Jeff B BenderSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
James D ForesterDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Shane C McKenzieMax McGraw Wildlife Foundation, Dundee Township, Illinois, USA.
Dominic A TravisDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Timothy J Johnson *Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Meggan E Craft *Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
University of Minnesota · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife can be exposed to antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARB) via multiple pathways. Spatial overlap with domestic animals is a prominent exposure pathway. However, most studies of wildlife-domestic animal interfaces have focused on livestock and little is known about the wildlife-companion animal interface. Here, we investigated the prevalence and phylogenetic relatedness of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant (ESC-R) Escherichia coli from raccoons (Procyon lotor) and domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in the metropolitan area of Chicago, IL, USA. To assess the potential importance of spatial overlap with dogs, we explored whether raccoons sampled at public parks (i.e., parks where people and dogs could enter) differed in prevalence and phylogenetic relatedness of ESC-R E. coli to raccoons sampled at private parks (i.e., parks where people and dogs could not enter). Raccoons had a significantly higher prevalence of ESC-R E. coli (56.9%) than dogs (16.5%). However, the richness of ESC-R E. coli did not vary by host species. Further, core single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based phylogenetic analyses revealed that isolates did not cluster by host species, and in some cases displayed a high degree of similarity (i.e., differed by less than 20 core SNPs). Spatial overlap analyses revealed that ESC-R E. coli were more likely to be isolated from raccoons at public parks than raccoons at private parks, but only for parks located in suburban areas of Chicago, not urban areas. That said, ESC-R E. coli isolated from raccoons did not genetically cluster by park of origin. Our findings suggest that domestic dogs and urban/suburban raccoons can have a diverse range of ARB, some of which display a high degree of genetic relatedness (i.e., differ by less than 20 core SNPs). Given the differences in prevalence, domestic dogs are unlikely to be an important source of exposure for mesocarnivores in urbanized areas.

Indexed as

AnimalsChicagoDog DiseasesDogsDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleMaleParks, RecreationalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRaccoonscephalosporindogEscherichia coliinterfacephylogeneticraccoonurban

Identifiers

PMID33990315
PMCPMC8315739
OpenAlexW3162342263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.