SynthesisInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2022
Mechanical thrombectomy versus medical care alone in large ischemic core: An up-to-date meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Identification and Patient Benefit Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting 90-Day Mortality After Endovascular Thrombectomy Based on Routinely Ready Clinical Information.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Follow-up infarct volume on fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging in distal medium vessel occlusions: the role of cerebral blood volume index.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Endovascular treatment for anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion ischemic stroke with low ASPECTS: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe compared outcomes and adverse events of thrombectomy versus medical management in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with baseline large infarct core.
methodsWe searched Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL, Cochrane Library Clinical Controlled Trials and EMBASE from inception to January 2021 for studies comparing thrombectomy and medical management alone in AIS patients who had ASPECTS <=7 or ischemic core volume >=50 ml. Imaging modalities to valuate ASPECTS and core volume were without restriction. The functional outcome was measured by mRS (modified Rankin Scale) score 0-2 at 90 days or discharge. The safety end point included the rates of mortality and sICH (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage) or PH2 (parenchymal hematoma type 2).
resultsFourteen studies with a total of 2547 patients (thrombectomy n = [1197]; medical care alone [n = 1350]) fulfilled our criteria. As for patients with low ASPECTS, pooled results indicated a higher odds of good functional outcome (OR = 3.47; 95% CI 1.99 to 6.07; P < 0.0001, I
conclusionThrombectomy remained safe and effective by careful selection in patients with low ASPECTS. More studies were warranted to explore contraindications for mechanical thrombectomy in AIS patients, especially in patients with large core volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.