ArticlePain2021
Investigating the specificity of the neurologic pain signature against breathlessness and finger opposition.
Article in Pain, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05623696 (Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) on Hypercapnic Air Hunger Induced in Healthy Individuals.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Empathetic solicitude attenuates the affective and sensory dimensions of COPsychophysiology · 2025Trial
- A predictive corticospinal model for pain perception.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Causal evidence linking chronic pain genetics to late-onset asthma via the nervous system.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Persistent disabilities 28 months after COVID-19 hospitalisation, a prospective cohort study.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Placebo treatment affects brain systems related to affective and cognitive processes, but not nociceptive pain.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Effect sizes and test-retest reliability of the fMRI-based neurologic pain signature.NeuroImage · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
abstractBrain biomarkers of pain, including pain-predictive "signatures" based on brain activity, can provide measures of neurophysiological processes and potential targets for interventions. A central issue relates to the specificity of such measures, and understanding their current limits will both advance their development and explore potentially generalizable properties of pain to other states. Here, we used 2 data sets to test the neurologic pain signature (NPS), an established pain neuromarker. In study 1, brain activity was measured using high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging (7T fMRI, N = 40) during 5 to 25 seconds of experimental breathlessness (induced by inspiratory resistive loading), conditioned breathlessness anticipation, and finger opposition. In study 2, we assessed anticipation and breathlessness perception (3T, N = 19) under blinded saline (placebo) and remifentanil administration. The NPS responded to breathlessness, anticipation, and finger opposition, although no direct comparisons with painful events were possible. Local NPS patterns in anterior or midinsula, S2, and dorsal anterior cingulate responded to breathlessness and finger opposition and were reduced by remifentanil. Local NPS responses in the dorsal posterior insula did not respond to any manipulations. Therefore, significant global NPS activity alone is not specific for pain, and we offer insight into the overlap between NPS responses, breathlessness, and somatomotor demand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.