Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33989999›Full record

ArticleGait & posture2021

Beyond Euler/Cardan analysis: True glenohumeral axial rotation during arm elevation and rotation.

Klevis Aliaj, K Bo Foreman, Peter N Chalmers, Heath B Henninger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gait & posture, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Klevis AliajDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. Electronic address: klevis.aliaj@utah.edu.
K Bo ForemanDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States; Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. Electronic address: bo.foreman@hsc.utah.edu.
Peter N ChalmersDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. Electronic address: Peter.Chalmers@hsc.utah.edu.
Heath B HenningerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. Electronic address: heath.henninger@utah.edu.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Biomechanics of Reverse Total Shoulder ArthroplastyR01AR067196 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HENNINGER, HEATH BYRON · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
From genomics to natural language processing: A protected environment for research computing in the health scienceS10OD021644 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CHEATHAM, THOMAS E. · 2017 to 2017
$494k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067196NIH HHS S10 OD021644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBased on Euler/Cardan analysis, prior investigations have reported up to 80° of glenohumeral (GH) external rotation during arm elevation, dependent on the plane of elevation (PoE). However, the subtraction of Euler/Cardan angles does not compute the rotation around the humerus' longitudinal axis (i.e. axial rotation). Clinicians want to understand the true rotation around the humerus' longitudinal axis and rely on laboratories to inform their understanding of underlying shoulder biomechanics, especially for the GH joint since its motion cannot be visually ascertained. True GH axial rotation has not been previously measured in vivo, and its difference from Euler/Cardan (apparent) axial rotation is unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the true GH axial rotation during arm elevation and external rotation, and does it vary from apparent axial rotation and by PoE?

methodsTwenty healthy subjects (10 M/10 F, ages 22-66) were recorded using biplane fluoroscopy while performing arm elevation in the coronal, scapular and sagittal planes, and external rotation in 0° and 90° of abduction. Apparent GH axial rotation was computed using the xz'y'' and yx'y'' sequences. True GH axial rotation was computed by integrating the projection of GH angular velocity onto the humerus' longitudinal axis. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping was utilized to compare apparent versus true axial rotation, axial rotation versus 0°, and detect differences in axial rotation by PoE.

resultsIn contrast to apparent axial rotation, true GH axial rotation does not differ by PoE and is not different than 0° during arm elevation at higher elevation angles. The spherical area between the sequence-specific and actual humeral trajectory explains the difference between apparent and true axial rotation. SIGNIFICANCE: Proper quantification of axial rotation is important because biomechanics literature informs clinical understanding of shoulder biomechanics. Clinicians care about true axial rotation, which should be reported in future studies of shoulder kinematics.

Indexed as

ArmShoulder JointAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularScapulaShoulderYoung AdultBiplane fluoroscopyGlenohumeralKinematic analysisTrue axial rotation

Identifiers

PMID33989999
PMCPMC8316370
OpenAlexW3162285591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.