Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33989683›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmology2021

Pneumatic Vitreolysis with Perfluoropropane for Vitreomacular Traction with and without Macular Hole: DRCR Retina Network Protocols AG and AH.

Clement K Chan, Calvin E Mein, Adam R Glassman, Wesley T Beaulieu, Claire T Calhoun, Glenn J Jaffe, Lee M Jampol, Mathew W MacCumber, Maureen G Maguire, Raj K Maturi and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Vitreomacular traction - a review.Eye (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  7. Single-arm clinical trials: design, ethics, principles.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Clement K ChanSouthern California Desert Retina Consultants, Palm Desert, California.
Calvin E MeinRetinal Consultants of San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Adam R GlassmanJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida. Electronic address: drcrstat2@jaeb.org.
Wesley T BeaulieuJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Claire T CalhounJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Glenn J JaffeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Lee M JampolFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Mathew W MacCumberRush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Maureen G MaguireDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Raj K MaturiMidwest Eye Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Hani Salehi-HadRetina Associates of Southern California, Huntington Beach, California.
Soraya RofaghaEast Bay Retina Consultants, Oakland, California, and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Jennifer K SunJoslin Diabetes Center, Beetham Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel F MartinCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
DRCR Retina Network
Jaeb Center for Health Research · USCleveland Clinic · USDuke University · USJoslin Diabetes Center · USMidwest Eye Institute · USNorthwestern University · USRetina Associates · USRetina Consultants of Texas · USRush University Medical Center · USSouthern California Desert Retina Consultants · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

DIABETIC RETINOPATHY CLINICAL RESEARCH NETWORK COORDINATING CENTERU10EY014231 · NEI · JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · PI GLASSMAN, ADAM R · 2002 to 2018
$91.2M
DRCR Retina NetworkUG1EY014231 · NEI · JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · PI Adam R Glassman, DANIEL F MARTIN · 2019 to 2026
$75.4M
NEI NIH HHS U10 EY014231NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY014231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate pneumatic vitreolysis (PVL) in eyes with vitreomacular traction (VMT) with and without full-thickness macular hole (FTMH).

designTwo multicenter (28 sites) studies: a randomized clinical trial comparing PVL with observation (sham injection) for VMT without FTMH (Protocol AG) and a single-arm study assessing PVL for FTMH (Protocol AH).

participantsParticipants were adults with central VMT (vitreomacular adhesion was ≤3000 μm). In Protocol AG, visual acuity (VA) was 20/32 to 20/400. In Protocol AH, eyes had a FTMH (≤250 μm at the narrowest point) and VA of 20/25 to 20/400.

methodsPneumatic vitreolysis using perfluoropropane (C

main outcome measuresCentral VMT release at 24 weeks (Protocol AG) and FTMH closure at 8 weeks (Protocol AH).

resultsFrom October 2018 through February 2020, 46 participants were enrolled in Protocol AG, and 35 were enrolled in Protocol AH. Higher than expected rates of retinal detachment and tear resulted in early termination of both protocols. Combining studies, 7 of 59 eyes (12% [95% CI, 6%-23%]; 2 eyes in Protocol AG, 5 eyes in Protocol AH) that received PVL developed rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (n = 6) or retinal tear (n = 1). At 24 weeks in Protocol AG, 18 of 23 eyes in the PVL group (78%) versus 2 of 22 eyes in the sham group (9%) achieved central VMT release without rescue vitrectomy (adjusted risk difference, 66% [95% CI, 44%-88%]; P< 0.001). The mean change in VA from baseline at 24 weeks was 6.7 letters in the PVL group and 6.1 letters in the sham group (adjusted difference, -0.8 [95% CI, -6.1 to 4.5]; P = 0.77). In Protocol AH, 10 of 35 eyes (29% [95% CI, 16%-45%]) achieved FTMH closure without rescue vitrectomy at 8 weeks. The mean change in VA from baseline at 8 weeks was -1.5 letters (95% CI, -10.3 to 7.3 letters).

conclusionsIn most eyes with VMT, PVL induced hyaloid release. In eyes with FTMH, PVL resulted in hole closure in approximately one third of eyes. These studies were terminated early because of safety concerns related to retinal detachments and retinal tears.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAgedContrast MediaFemaleFluorocarbonsFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleRetinal PerforationsRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceVitrectomyVitreous BodyVitreous DetachmentContrast MediaFluorocarbonsperflutrenC(3)F(8)DRCR Retina NetworkPneumatic vitreolysisVitreomacular traction macular hole

Identifiers

PMID33989683
PMCPMC8545749
OpenAlexW3161655332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.