Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33989647›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2021

The neural processing of pitch accents in continuous speech.

Fernando Llanos, James S German, G Nike Gnanateja, Bharath Chandrasekaran

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando LlanosDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Linguistics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
James S GermanAix-Marseille University, CNRS, LPL, Aix-en-Provence, France.
G Nike GnanatejaDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Bharath ChandrasekaranDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: b.chandra@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Supplement to cortical contributions to frequency-following response generation and modulationR01DC013315 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ABEL, TAYLOR JOHN, CHANDRASEKARAN, BHARATH · 2014 to 2025
$5.5M
Neural Systems in Auditory and Speech CategorizationR01DC015504 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI CHANDRASEKARAN, BHARATH · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013315NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pitch accents are local pitch patterns that convey differences in word prominence and modulate the information structure of the discourse. Despite the importance to discourse in languages like English, neural processing of pitch accents remains understudied. The current study investigates the neural processing of pitch accents by native and non-native English speakers while they are listening to or ignoring 45 min of continuous, natural speech. Leveraging an approach used to study phonemes in natural speech, we analyzed thousands of electroencephalography (EEG) segments time-locked to pitch accents in a prosodic transcription. The optimal neural discrimination between pitch accent categories emerged at latencies between 100 and 200 ms. During these latencies, we found a strong structural alignment between neural and phonetic representations of pitch accent categories. In the same latencies, native listeners exhibited more robust processing of pitch accent contrasts than non-native listeners. However, these group differences attenuated when the speech signal was ignored. We can reliably capture the neural processing of discrete and contrastive pitch accent categories in continuous speech. Our analytic approach also captures how language-specific knowledge and selective attention influences the neural processing of pitch accent categories.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionAuditory PerceptionHumansLanguagePhoneticsContinuous speechEEGF0Language experiencePitch accentsProsodySelective attention

Identifiers

PMID33989647
PMCPMC8277729
OpenAlexW3161698589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.