Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33989623›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental research2021

Ozone exposure during early pregnancy and preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kristen M Rappazzo, Jennifer L Nichols, R Byron Rice, Thomas J Luben

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Linking mixtures of air pollution exposures and preterm birth with a self-organizing map.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: A review of underlying mechanisms.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristen M RappazzoU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, USA. Electronic address: Rappazzo.kristen@epa.gov.
Jennifer L NicholsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, USA.
R Byron RiceU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, USA.
Thomas J LubenU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to ozone has been linked to reproductive outcomes, including preterm birth. In this systematic review, we summarize published epidemiologic cohort and case-control studies examining ozone exposures (estimated on a continuous scale) in early pregnancy (1st and 2nd trimesters (T1, T2)) and preterm birth using ratio measures, and perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the potential relationship between them. Studies were identified by searching PubMed and Web of Science, screened according to predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, and evaluated for study quality. We extracted study data including effect estimates, confidence limits, study location, study years, ozone exposure assessment method, and mean or median ozone concentrations. Nineteen studies were identified and included, of which 18 examined T1 exposure (17 reported effect estimates), and 15 examined T2 exposure. Random effects meta-analysis was performed in the metafor package, R 3.5.3. The pooled OR (95% CI) for a 10 ppb increase in ozone exposure in T1 was 1.06 (1.03, 1.10) with a 95% prediction interval of 0.95, 1.19; for T2 it was 1.05 (1.02, 1.08) with a 95% prediction interval of 0.95, 1.16. Effect estimates for both exposure periods showed high heterogeneity. In meta-regression analyses of study characteristics, study location (continent) explained some (~20%) heterogeneity for T1 exposure studies, but no characteristic explained a substantial amount of heterogeneity for T2 exposure studies. Increased ozone exposure during early pregnancy is associated with preterm birth across studies.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionOzonePremature BirthFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParticulate MatterPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeAir PollutantsOzoneParticulate MatterAir pollutionMeta-analysisMeta-regressionOzonePreterm birthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33989623
PMCPMC8221456
OpenAlexW3163003459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.