Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33989366›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

What makes music memorable? Relationships between acoustic musical features and music-evoked emotions and memories in older adults.

Ilja Salakka, Anni Pitkäniemi, Emmi Pentikäinen, Kari Mikkonen, Pasi Saari, Petri Toiviainen, Teppo Särkämö

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the nature of music-evoked autobiographical memories in healthy aging: A mixed-methods study.Musicae scientiae : the journal of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multifaceted Music Therapy for Depression in Dementia: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. 2024 IEEE 5th International Symposium on the Internet of Sounds. International Symposium on the Internet of Sounds (5th : 2024 : Erlangen, Germany)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ilja SalakkaDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Music, Ageing and Rehabilitation Team, Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7489-3647
Anni PitkäniemiDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Music, Ageing and Rehabilitation Team, Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Emmi PentikäinenDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Music, Ageing and Rehabilitation Team, Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Kari MikkonenSentina Ltd, Rajamäki, Finland.
Pasi SaariDepartment of Music, Art and Culture Studies, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Petri ToiviainenDepartment of Music, Art and Culture Studies, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6962-2957
Teppo SärkämöDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Music, Ageing and Rehabilitation Team, Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Jyväskylä · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesMusic has a unique capacity to evoke both strong emotions and vivid autobiographical memories. Previous music information retrieval (MIR) studies have shown that the emotional experience of music is influenced by a combination of musical features, including tonal, rhythmic, and loudness features. Here, our aim was to explore the relationship between music-evoked emotions and music-evoked memories and how musical features (derived with MIR) can predict them both.

methodsHealthy older adults (N = 113, age ≥ 60 years) participated in a listening task in which they rated a total of 140 song excerpts comprising folk songs and popular songs from 1950s to 1980s on five domains measuring the emotional (valence, arousal, emotional intensity) and memory (familiarity, autobiographical salience) experience of the songs. A set of 24 musical features were extracted from the songs using computational MIR methods. Principal component analyses were applied to reduce multicollinearity, resulting in six core musical components, which were then used to predict the behavioural ratings in multiple regression analyses.

resultsAll correlations between behavioural ratings were positive and ranged from moderate to very high (r = 0.46-0.92). Emotional intensity showed the highest correlation to both autobiographical salience and familiarity. In the MIR data, three musical components measuring salience of the musical pulse (Pulse strength), relative strength of high harmonics (Brightness), and fluctuation in the frequencies between 200-800 Hz (Low-mid) predicted both music-evoked emotions and memories. Emotional intensity (and valence to a lesser extent) mediated the predictive effect of the musical components on music-evoked memories.

conclusionsThe results suggest that music-evoked emotions are strongly related to music-evoked memories in healthy older adults and that both music-evoked emotions and memories are predicted by the same core musical features.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationMemory, EpisodicMusicAgedAged, 80 and overEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID33989366
PMCPMC8121320
OpenAlexW3161858398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.