Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33989342›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Investigation of visual and physical factors associated with inadequate instillation of eyedrops among patients with glaucoma.

Kenji Kashiwagi, Yuji Matsuda, Yuka Ito, Hisami Kawate, Masako Sakamoto, Shinji Obi, Hirotaka Haro

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Alternatives to Topical Glaucoma Medication for Glaucoma Management.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kenji KashiwagiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8506-8503
Yuji MatsudaDivision of Rehabilitation, University of Yamanashi Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
Yuka ItoDepartment of Nursing, University of Yamanashi Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
Hisami KawateDepartment of Nursing, University of Yamanashi Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
Masako SakamotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Shinji ObiDivision of Rehabilitation, University of Yamanashi Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
Hirotaka HaroDivision of Rehabilitation, University of Yamanashi Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of eyedrop instillation failure and its related physical and visual function factors among glaucoma patients who used hypotensive eyedrops daily. SUBJECTS AND

methodsPatients with a history of self-instillation of one or more ocular hypotensive ophthalmic solutions for six or more months were enrolled. Definitions of instillation failure were eyedrop instillation other than on the eye surface; eyedrop contact with eyelashes; eyedrop bottle tip contact with the eyelashes, eye surface or ocular adnexa; or two or more drops instilled with one instillation trial. To clarify factors related to instillation failure, we used visual function tests and investigated cervical spine extension angles during instillation, pinching strength, physical ataxia (evaluated using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia), motor dysfunction of the upper limbs (evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire), and vision quality (evaluated using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25).

resultsOf 103 total subjects, 61.2% satisfied the definition of instillation failure. Instillation of the eyedrop other than at the cul-desac (76.2%) was the most frequent reason for failure, followed by contact of the tip of the eyedrop bottle (22.2%) and instillation of the same or more than two eyedrops in a single attempt (11.1%). Advanced age, a shallow cervical spine extension angle, weak pinching strength, poor motor dysfunction of the upper limbs, the degree of ataxia, poor best-corrected visual acuity, and visual field scores were significant risk factors for instillation failure. Vision quality may have some relation to instillation failure.

conclusionIt is highly recommended that instillation failure be routinely investigated even among patients with adequate experience using eyedrops and that correct therapies are chosen in a patient-based fashion.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedFemaleGlaucomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID33989342
PMCPMC8121298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.