Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33989331›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Is the HPV-test more cost-effective than cytology in cervical cancer screening? An economic analysis from a middle-income country.

Diama Bhadra Vale, Marcus Tolentino Silva, Michelle Garcia Discacciati, Ilana Polegatto, Julio Cesar Teixeira, Luiz Carlos Zeferino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Introduction of DNA-HPV test in the Brazilian cervical cancer screening program: When the idea is good but does not fit the budget.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evidence of Decreased Long-term Risk of Cervical Precancer after Negative Primary HPV Screens Compared with Negative Cytology Screens in a Longitudinal Cohort Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  9. A Global Survey of Self-Reported Cancer Screening Practices by Health Professionals for Kidney Transplant Candidates and Recipients.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Risk Profile of High-grade Cervical Lesions and Cervical Cancer Considering the Combination of Cytology, HPV Genotype, and Age among Women Undergoing Colposcopy.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A New Brazilian Device for Cervical Cancer Screening: Acceptability and Accuracy of Self-sampling.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Cervical Cancer Screening with DNA-HPV Testing and Precancerous Lesions Detection: A Brazilian Population-based Demonstration Study.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diama Bhadra ValeObstetrics and Gynecology Department, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2423-0225
Marcus Tolentino SilvaProgram in Pharmaceutical Science, University of Sorocaba, Sorocaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7186-9075
Michelle Garcia DiscacciatiObstetrics and Gynecology Department, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Ilana PolegattoObstetrics and Gynecology Department, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9469-1460
Julio Cesar TeixeiraObstetrics and Gynecology Department, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0979-376X
Luiz Carlos ZeferinoObstetrics and Gynecology Department, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report a modelling study using local health care costs and epidemiological inputs from a population-based program to access the cost-effectiveness of adopting hrHPV test.

methodsA cost-effectiveness analysis based on a microsimulation dynamic Markov model. Data and costs were based on data from the local setting and literature review. The setting was Indaiatuba, Brazil, that has adopted the hrHPV test in place of cytology since 2017. After calibrating the model, one million women were simulated in hypothetical cohorts. Three strategies were tested: cytology to women aged 25 to 64 every three years; hrHPV test to women 25-64 every five years; cytology to women 25-29 years every three years and hrHPV test to women 30-64 every five years (hybrid strategy). Outcomes were Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER).

resultsThe hrHPV testing and the hybrid strategy were the dominant strategies. Costs were lower and provided a more effective option at a negative incremental ratio of US$ 37.87 for the hybrid strategy, and negative US$ 6.16 for the HPV strategy per QALY gained. Reduction on treatment costs would influence a decrease in ICER, and an increase in the costs of the hrHPV test would increase ICER.

conclusionsUsing population-based data, the switch from cytology to hrHPV testing in the cervical cancer screening program of Indaiatuba is less costly and cost-effective than the old cytology program.

Indexed as

PapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID33989331
PMCPMC8121350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.