ArticleTropical animal health and production2021
Evaluation of ELISA and PCR in parallel to single intradermal cervical tuberculin test (SICT) for diagnosis of tuberculosis in buffaloes.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Global Prevalence of Tuberculosis Infection in Buffaloes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Evaluation of serological assays forFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Molecular diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis on postmortem carcasses during routine meat inspection in Benin: GeneXpertVeterinary world · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bovine tuberculosis is an economically important disease with very high zoonotic potential. Single intradermal cervical tuberculin test (SICT) is considered a gold standard assay for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. However, bovines especially buffaloes may produce a false negative result when the animal becomes cell-mediated immune (CMI) anergic in the advanced stage of the disease. In the present study, ELISA and PCR assays were successfully demonstrated to be useful in diagnosing tuberculosis especially in the CMI anergic buffaloes infected with Mycobacterium bovis. ELISA and PCR assays are able to detect 8.94% and 8.13%, respectively, more animals as positive in comparison to standard SICT assay in a selected population of 123 buffaloes. The moderate agreement between SICT and ELISA (k: 0.528; 0.249-0.807), a substantial agreement between SICT and PCR (k: 0.648; 0.364-0.931), and high agreement between ELISA and PCR (k: 0.856; 0.697-1.0) highlight that ELISA and PCR, if used in parallel with SICT, will provide better sensitivity over single assay. Reduction of false negative reactors may help in minimizing the zoonotic threat from bovine tuberculosis especially in disease endemic region where human and livestock interface is quite high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.